Readit News logoReadit News
scroblart commented on The healthcare market is taxing reproduction out of existence   aaronstannard.com/40k-bab... · Posted by u/Aaronontheweb
mattcantstop · 20 days ago
I have the opposite viewpoint, and I lean heavily progressive in most of my views.

Healthcare in the United States isn't a market, and that is why it is so terrible. For instance, there is no reasonable ability to compare prices of services. Prices are entirely hidden. Then there is the "with insurance" price vs cash prices.

Healthcare doesn't function as a market, to our detriment.

scroblart · 19 days ago
yes, "heavily progressive" and advocating that market solutions would address the root causes of the healthcare situation in America. You guys are great

Deleted Comment

scroblart commented on Who needs Git when you have 1M context windows?   alexmolas.com/2025/07/28/... · Posted by u/alexmolas
scroblart · 2 months ago
this shit is so depressing, having a "secret sauce" and it being just mystical and unknowable, a magic incantation which you hopefully scribbled down to remember later
scroblart commented on German parliament votes as a Git contribution graph   abstimmung.eu/git/2024... · Posted by u/mxschll
eru · 9 months ago
> I would love to see more governments operate on a Git-first basis, so that each and every decision/contribution can be tracked online for transparency.

Alas, that sounds like a great idea in principle, but is probably a bad idea in practice.

Speeches in parliament (or on the senate floor, in the US) are already public. And that's a big reason those speeches are useless: they are just used as grandstanding to the general public.

The real work in finding compromises happens behind closed doors. That way you avoid producing sound bytes that can be used against you next election season. Especially from challengers in your own party, who could otherwise accuse you of being insufficiently pure.

scroblart · 9 months ago
yeah transparency is bad news, the real problem is voters demands for purity from their politicians
scroblart commented on Dire warnings about Libya dams went unheeded   nytimes.com/2023/09/16/wo... · Posted by u/dredmorbius
meepmorp · 2 years ago
The dams were unmaintained for years before the Qadaffi government fell.
scroblart · 2 years ago
Even the nyt is willing to admit that work had begun on the dams before NATO started bombing, they feel obligated to let that tiny crack of truth in
scroblart commented on Lisping at JPL (2002)   flownet.com/gat/jpl-lisp.... · Posted by u/sandinmyjoints
GoOnThenDoTell · 6 years ago
I honestly couldn’t think of a positive thing for adtech. Do share
scroblart · 6 years ago
It is doing the great and worthy work of connecting consumers with the products they desire.
scroblart commented on On Joi and MIT   medium.com/@lessig/on-joi... · Posted by u/tempsy
smacktoward · 6 years ago
But see, he knows Joi. And naturally, nobody he knows would be the type of person to do something as terrible as enable a notorious abuser of children for profit!

This is the deep rot at the heart of the American elite system: once you're in the club, it's effectively impossible for anything you do to get you kicked out of it. You become anointed as the Right Sort of Person, and everybody accepts that when the Right Sort of Person does something terrible, it's not because they're actually not the Right Sort of Person. It's just an oversight, an oopsie, an opportunity for Learning and Growth. You're operating among friends, and standards among friends are more forgiving than they are among the public at large.

(Even worse, not only are you anointed as the Right Sort of Person, but your children automatically are as well. And they have even less justification for being treated that way than you did.)

Which is why a lot of people are misunderstanding the root problem in the Epstein case. It's not that Epstein corrupted everything and everyone he touched, it's that an Epstein could only exist in an environment where everything was corrupt already. Epstein was the symptom, not the disease.

scroblart · 6 years ago
Exactly
scroblart commented on Evidence of a nocebo response following a nationwide antidepressant drug switch   cpe.psychopen.eu/article/... · Posted by u/EndXA
ddorian43 · 7 years ago
Hmm depends on the country I guess.

But believe me there are bad doctors out there (your specific case) so you'll have to switch.

scroblart · 7 years ago
I've successfully avoided this kind of crap (never fell for the medication frenzy). Somebody close to me was able to find a psychiatrist who would assist them in getting off meds only when a third party intervened.

The problem is not with individual doctors, it is that the structure {legal, economic} surrounding mental health favors getting people on medication, but doesn't create good paths for them to get off (at least in the US).

scroblart commented on Evidence of a nocebo response following a nationwide antidepressant drug switch   cpe.psychopen.eu/article/... · Posted by u/EndXA
ddorian43 · 7 years ago
Then you change doctors until you find someone that will listen to you.
scroblart · 7 years ago
Right. I'm saying that is easier said than done.
scroblart commented on Evidence of a nocebo response following a nationwide antidepressant drug switch   cpe.psychopen.eu/article/... · Posted by u/EndXA
ddorian43 · 7 years ago
That doesn't make any sense. So if a drug isn't providing any benefits (or too many side effects) your doc won't help you to quit it ??
scroblart · 7 years ago
Often the doctor that a person has when they realize that they need to get off a medication is not the original doctor that prescribed the medication.

And yes, most psychiatrists don't want the liability of weaning somebody off a medication.

You are right, it doesn't make any sense--it certainly is not good for patients.

u/scroblart

KarmaCake day13October 26, 2018View Original