Readit News logoReadit News

Deleted Comment

rqs commented on Tars: Tencent's microservice RPC framework, open-sourced to Linux Foundation   tarscloud.org/feeds/34632... · Posted by u/tarscloud
kbumsik · 6 years ago
I will never be interested in any projects whose primary language is Chinese, or any languages other than English.

I wouldn't care if the project is targeted to China. But it is donated to The Linux Foundation. The Linux Foundation should have not accepted such projects at the beginning.

I'm Korean and there is nothing to do with China itself. But the more we accept projects like this, the more they like to write in their language. What's worst is that their Github issue page will be full of Chinese that other people will not understand. I don't want to see the programming culture get fragmented just because of the language.

rqs · 6 years ago
Here is some basic concept you may need to understand: The language (Both in natural and programming) choice of a project is usually depends on the interests of the main contributors. The main contributors will select the one that is best for them, and make improvement base on that.

Since the project is mainly done by Tencent, a Chinese company, it just make since for the project to use Chinese. I see no point for their team members to communicate with one and other by writing documents in a second language everyday.

Also, they've provided English document if you want to read, and the document is not bad. If you don't like the document, then send them some PR.

rqs commented on Gitlab considers not hiring SREs and Support Engineers in China and Russia   gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www... · Posted by u/capableweb
computerex · 6 years ago
Nationalism has always been high in China ever since the CCP took control. Not being a nationalist would be a good way to suddenly disappear off the face of the Earth.

China has always had double standards. They make it hell for U.S companies to do business there. The only thing that has changed is that the U.S has started pushing back somewhat as of late, but things are still currently in favor of China.

When China makes draconian laws like this: https://www.chinalawblog.com/2019/09/chinas-new-cybersecurit...

Is it really a surprise that companies that care about their customer privacy would be hesitant in dealing with China? Is it inconceivable that data breaches and unauthorized access of data/systems could happen through Chinese employees? These are some of the things you have to think about.

Maybe the Chinese government should look at the year (2019) and realize that personal liberties, sovereignty and privacy are important to the "west". If China is going to disrespect our important values, than what you are seeing in this Gitlab discussion is bound to take place for companies that are sensitive about protecting their customers.

rqs · 6 years ago
> China has always had double standards. They make it hell for U.S companies to do business there

Here we go. "CCP is bad and China is bad, so every Chinese is bad". This kind of logic is not very healthy, it just like saying "Google(Or insert any company here) is bad, let's punish their employees", it will hurt those employees (way) more than it hurt Google.

Put the story into context, if Chinese engineers cannot find a job oversea, they will probably go back to China and contribute to a Chinese company that operate under CCP's rule. Will that be a good thing for you eventually?

I bet CCP is also counting on the rising nationalism in the US as well, to drive Chinese engineers back home with their valuable knowledge.

rqs commented on Ex-World of Warcraft developer's thread about China and the gaming industry   twitter.com/Grummz/status... · Posted by u/seapunk
pbourke · 6 years ago
Is your argument that adopting democracy and the rule of law are risky to elites and the ruling party? Well, yeah - that’s sort of self-evidently true.

> How about tweak the thinking a bit: What's in there for China to totally embraced democracy?

Tweak your thinking a bit: the advantage would ultimately be to the anonymous Chinese citizen 50 years from now who wants to vote, express an opinion, join a social group, participate in a religion, petition their government for redress, etc.

rqs · 6 years ago
> Is your argument that adopting democracy and the rule of law are risky to elites and the ruling party?

No, just trying to explain why China does not go all-in and jump to the democracy train.

CCP apparently don't want to build something (Institution of democracy for example) that will later overthrow them (too risky, even maybe there is something good in it), and elites are bounded with CCP (That's why many of them are allowed to be elites). For CCP, "Without the CCP, There Would Be No New China"[0] is still the safest approach to any domestic problems.

Also, the westerners did not bring democracy into China, so Chinese people are not necessarily benefited from the western democracy. No benefit, no motive.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Without_the_Communist_Party,_T...

rqs commented on South Park Responds to Being Banned in China for “Band in China”   twitter.com/SouthPark/sta... · Posted by u/thedudeabides5
point78 · 6 years ago
Is there an "underground" in China of people criticising the government and supporting hong kong, tibet, etc? If yes, how many people?
rqs · 6 years ago
I know an online forum if that counts, https://pincong.rocks (Chinese, Browse with Tor) they're pretty anti-CCP in my opinion, and the only one I know of.

I don't agreed with many of their posts, but if you want to waste your time in the chaotic Chinese political small talks, then maybe that's one place to look at. Also, keep in mind that you reading small talks there, so take everything with a grain of salt.

I personally acquire most of the information on Twitter. I followed many people who working in the IT or related fields, and sometime they retweet political related stuff (As joke or mock mostly). This is how I know about that South Park episode.

rqs commented on South Park Responds to Being Banned in China for “Band in China”   twitter.com/SouthPark/sta... · Posted by u/thedudeabides5
bartread · 6 years ago
I apologise: that remark was unfair and out of line. I was over-tired and jumped to a conclusion.

Thanks also for the clarification: now I understand what you were saying.

rqs · 6 years ago
Actually, me should be the one who apologize.

Sometime I just somehow prioritized to send message out when I should be making a better statement. Which already caused multiple misunderstandings on HN alone. I should definitely try not to do that anymore.

rqs commented on Ex-World of Warcraft developer's thread about China and the gaming industry   twitter.com/Grummz/status... · Posted by u/seapunk
roenxi · 6 years ago
It is interesting to look back at the last ~50 years from a strategic standpoint. The West gambled that economic prosperity would usher in an age of Chinese liberty, if not actual democracy, and that attempts to resist that would lead to economic collapse.

With benefit of hindsight maybe that strategy was too passive. China has embraced the technical aspects of Western society but it looks dangerously like it will carry them with an authoritarian philosophy. It is a pity; particularly since the English Common Law system combined with separation of power is the greatest accomplishment of the Anglosphere and China would have really ushered in an age of enlightenment had they taken that on.

rqs · 6 years ago
> China has embraced the technical aspects of Western society but it looks dangerously like it will carry them with an authoritarian philosophy.

How about tweak the thinking a bit: What's in there for China to totally embraced democracy? Will it become an advantage for the country (Or the leading elites at least), guaranteed? What if the change has failed and lead to something worse?

There are risk factors, and people don't like to take risks. Which is why societal changes are more likely to occur during crisis and disasters, because people simply have nothing to lose anymore.

For CCP, the "Take half the cake" approach is less risky for them, so they did that, and now everybody see what's happened after.

rqs commented on South Park Responds to Being Banned in China for “Band in China”   twitter.com/SouthPark/sta... · Posted by u/thedudeabides5
bartread · 6 years ago
I agree: GP reads like spun/machine-generated content.
rqs · 6 years ago
"machine-generated" because my English mode still cold. I'm learning English with RNN, it takes awhile.
rqs commented on South Park Responds to Being Banned in China for “Band in China”   twitter.com/SouthPark/sta... · Posted by u/thedudeabides5
product50 · 6 years ago
What are you saying? What is your point?
rqs · 6 years ago
The point is: This country is not taking any critic any more. And, that's one of the reasons why the Cultural Revolution is ended horribly. Which is why this should raise some concern at least for Chinese people.
rqs commented on South Park Responds to Being Banned in China for “Band in China”   twitter.com/SouthPark/sta... · Posted by u/thedudeabides5
rqs · 6 years ago
I'm not a South Park fan, but that ban got my interested so I watched the episode (Yeah, that episode is banned in China and few "reposter"s has been warned for posting South Park related contents).

Few days ago, a guy been sent to jail for 7 days because he was complaining the National Day military parade, saying something like "A civilized nation turn machine into soldier; a rouge nation turn soldier into machine". And he's not the only one been sent to jail for similar reason.

This country is not taking any critic any more. Cultural Revolution 2.0 Global Edition anybody?

https://twitter.com/ytchui_M/status/1181289272466231296

u/rqs

KarmaCake day1036September 28, 2017View Original