Are you the kind of person who believes convincing sounding research from an Ivy League school posted on social media and wikipedia articles? Is your epistemology based in socialmediaism?
Are you the kind of person who believes convincing sounding research from an Ivy League school posted on social media and wikipedia articles? Is your epistemology based in socialmediaism?
My current use of AI is to generate code - or translate some code from a programming language to another - which I can then improve (instead of writing it from stratch). Speed isn't necessary for this. It's a nice-to-have but only if it's not at the cost of quality.
Also, as unfair as it "might" be, we do expect a fast AI not to be as good, don't we? So I wouldn't focus on that in the marketing. I think speed would be easier to sell as something extra you would pay for, because then you'd expect the quality to remain the same or better.
Because it's irrelevant.
> but if this was driven by a government, does Google really deserve all the blame?
Of course. If the government ordered Google to assist in a genocide against some demographic, and Google goes along with it, it doesn't matter if the government is also evil. Google is evil for playing ball.
And we don't have to speak in hypotheticals. Both Google and Amazon are actively engaging in tech-assisted genocide.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/4/23/what-is-project-nim...
I have boycotted Amazon for a while now and I'd boycott Google too if it wasn't so pervasive in my professional life.
Dead Comment
I do wish it had the ability to respond to emails for me though with a prompt.
If you feel MAGA's assault on science is NOT an act of grievous self harm, you could provide your argument as to why you believe that to be the case. Otherwise you're just contributing noise.
Welcome to the future.
If you want a better differentiation, is computer science the same as magic? Is there no difference between the skills someone develops as a professional and expert in their field, and the lay person? Everyone has the same level of ability and willingness to understand a subject?
For example, did you read the article before commenting?
The idea here is exactly what you say, belief in authority because science people spend time on it. Essentially this is science as religion. Which was exactly my point.