Readit News logoReadit News
rawtxapp commented on Why am I no longer qualified to be a Brex customer?   brex.com/support/why-am-i... · Posted by u/tvjames
MaxGabriel · 3 years ago
(I'm CTO of Mercury)

To clarify, when rawtxapp said "Wire transfers cost 20$ each", they probably mean wiring _to_ Mercury from their bank costs $20. Mercury doesn't charge for sending wires.

The reason they're mentioning the 3rd party bank fees is they'd prefer to use ACH pull to have Mercury take the money directly from their existing bank account (similar to how your gym or electric company might do). We do offer this, but only if you use a service called Plaid to link your third party bank account.

This involves typing your bank's username/password/2FA into a Plaid iframe on our website, which confirms it with the third party bank. If you've used Venmo, that's using Plaid under the hood to link your bank account.

Ok, all that said, my question for rawtxapp: are you mostly asking for us to verify 3rd party bank accounts via microdeposit instead? I agree it's less privacy invasive, but, definitely pretty slow and 1990s like you said about checks. I'm not sure of the security either.

I'm somewhat hoping it's less of an issue as more banks move to doing OAuth in Plaid, instead of sharing passwords. Capital One, Wells Fargo, and Chase do this now (we should really move to doing it too).

rawtxapp · 3 years ago
> are you mostly asking for us to verify 3rd party bank accounts via microdeposit instead?

Yes, I'm fine waiting a couple days for the initial setup if it means I don't have to let Plaid see every single transaction coming in and out of my account (and see my password in plaintext and all that). If you'd support USDC deposits, that would be even better (instant settlement with no reversibility, so no risk to you), but I'm guessing that might be a stretch. Regardless, Mercury is a very nice service as is, thank you!

rawtxapp commented on Why am I no longer qualified to be a Brex customer?   brex.com/support/why-am-i... · Posted by u/tvjames
immad · 3 years ago
CEO of Mercury here.

If you are looking for an alternative, we are 100% committed to businesses of all sizes:

A) the smallest businesses can be the next big startup

B) We maintain strong unit economics at all sizes.

We setup a landing page to get these customers onboarded quickly: https://mercury.com/partner/brex

rawtxapp · 3 years ago
Mercury is awesome! Not sure if this is right venue for feedback, but if only you could offer ACH without Plaid (which feels like a huge invasion of privacy), it would be even more awesome. Wire transfers cost 20$ each, depositing by check feels like the 1990s and takes time to clear.

Deleted Comment

rawtxapp commented on Attacking an Ethereum L2 with Unbridled Optimism   saurik.com/optimism.html... · Posted by u/daegloe
8note · 4 years ago
> participants have the option to create an L1 transaction

Theoretically they have that option, but in practice do they?

Theoretically I can sue visa to get the right outcome too, which is a good guarantee

rawtxapp · 4 years ago
You can close a channel whenever you want, for whatever reason.
rawtxapp commented on Attacking an Ethereum L2 with Unbridled Optimism   saurik.com/optimism.html... · Posted by u/daegloe
jimmydorry · 4 years ago
I thought the routing node was putting up some amount of Bitcoin per channel. Each channel would therefore have a non-zero cost (and each user requires a channel).

I would need to go back and refresh my understand as it's been quite a while since I read the LN whitepaper, much less kept abreast of developments in that space.

rawtxapp · 4 years ago
When you fund a channel, the Bitcoin is still yours, you're not giving it away.

With batched channel open/closes, it'll be super cheap to open and close channels. The only cost you'd pay is the opportunity cost if your counterparty isn't sending transactions, so you're not collecting routing fees. If that's the case, you can just close the channel if you need to fund another channel and don't have spare Bitcoin for it, but that's about it.

rawtxapp commented on Attacking an Ethereum L2 with Unbridled Optimism   saurik.com/optimism.html... · Posted by u/daegloe
mhmmmmmm · 4 years ago
You still have transaction costs in the form of transport costs to get the gold to your personal location.
rawtxapp · 4 years ago
Yep, and obviously any kind of transportation like that will be tracked and easily traced, with exact weights and sizes.

By hopping on the lightning network, you're essentially anonymizing your payments as well as making them practically free.

rawtxapp commented on Attacking an Ethereum L2 with Unbridled Optimism   saurik.com/optimism.html... · Posted by u/daegloe
BoorishBears · 4 years ago
Hasn't time already proven the skeptics right?

The biggest sources of skeptism were around logistics and value as a currency:

Is there a cryptocoin that has successfully solved logistics without disastrously failing as a currency?

Even if you ignore the environmental aspect... has any coin that has achieved scale not experienced deflation that would make the Great Depression look like a hiccup?

To me the skepticism has always been "you can't have a functional decentralized currency". Some people take that at face value and proudly proclaim "people will accept your BTC/ETH/etc."

But most people mean it in the sense we think of currencies belonging to non-failed states: aka being a somewhat stable store of value. More widely used for payment of productive economic output than fraud and speculation...

-

I see crypto as I see Tesla, maybe there way a point but it's long buried under the mania.

Disclaimer: Due to that mania I keep some as hedge, but again, imagine saying I keep dollars under my pillow as a hedge that next year they might have 10x'd in value...

rawtxapp · 4 years ago
Has it?

Bitcoin is bigger than ever before. It's far more valuable, it has far more users, processes hundreds of thousands of transactions moving billions of dollars worth of value every day on-chain alone, has very healthy L2 layer growth (1ml.com), has hundreds of exchanges worldwide, it ticks every 10 minutes and will keep ticking for the foreseeable future. We have a small country that adopted it as a legal tender with more countries coming on the Bitcoin standard potentially this year.

People only see the fiat currencies and forget that we've run on gold standard for thousands of years and fiat currencies are barely 50 years old and riddled with financial crises left and right. Bitcoin is digital gold, strictly better than gold. But anyways, we'll see what happens in the future.

rawtxapp commented on Attacking an Ethereum L2 with Unbridled Optimism   saurik.com/optimism.html... · Posted by u/daegloe
dan-robertson · 4 years ago
Are the stakes that huge for potential exploiters? It seems that exploits can write off a bunch of value from the exploited but, at least for big and quickly noticed exploits, it is hard to launder the gains into the ‘legitimate’ part of the ecosystem with big exchanges and suchlike.
rawtxapp · 4 years ago
I think last year alone had more than a billion dollars worth of crypto hacked on defi, there's some trackers out there [1]. On one hand, you have amateurs that leave their private keys on cloud services and try to cash out while living in a place like NYC, on the other hand, you have people who know what they are doing or perhaps live in places that actively encourage those activities [2].

1: https://cryptosec.info/defi-hacks/

2: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-59990477

rawtxapp commented on Attacking an Ethereum L2 with Unbridled Optimism   saurik.com/optimism.html... · Posted by u/daegloe
kristofferR · 4 years ago
The discussion here used to be way more thoughtful, it's only been bad the last year or so.

I think the degradation of crypto discourse here was mostly a knee-jerk reaction to NFTs. "NFTs are stupid, so all crypto is stupid, because NFTs are crypto" - that was likely the thought process behind all the toxicity seen here.

rawtxapp · 4 years ago
I would disagree, in my experience HN has been pretty anti-crypto for a long time, starting with Bitcoin's announcement thread [1].

Personally, I think people are just tired, as a proponent I'm tired of arguing the same stuff over and over again, I can imagine the other side of that too. At this point, time will decide who's right and wrong, I think that what anyone of us thinks doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things.

1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=599852

rawtxapp commented on Attacking an Ethereum L2 with Unbridled Optimism   saurik.com/optimism.html... · Posted by u/daegloe
gillesjacobs · 4 years ago
That's an issue with all cryptocurrency infrastructure though: projects need to be proven to demonstrate robust value and it's probably one of the most adversarial spaces in software. History has shown that hacks and exploits of projects hurt the price of the native taken but do not really damage the long-term earned trust.
rawtxapp · 4 years ago
Exactly this, it's a very adversarial environment with huge stakes for those that can exploit it. Even projects that have been around for months, years can get exploited which is why I'd recommend waiting a long time before putting non-trivial amounts into any smart contract or crypto related projects.

That's also a big plus for Bitcoin, because it's been around the longest and because it's so much simpler than more complex chains like eth, it's as secure as it gets.

u/rawtxapp

KarmaCake day2014April 9, 2019
About
rawtx.com
View Original