I see comments like this in various reviews. Are there really people out there who would replace a Macbook Pro M1 or M2 with a M3 just to get something a bit faster? What are they doing that is so performance critical?
My last Macbook Pro is a 2014. I still find it usable for development work, and I'm only replacing it because of other hardware failures.
My impression is that it is useful only in the Apple ecosystem. It that correct? Is it worth learning for things other than iOS and macOS applications?
1) There were some cashless fast food outlets that I couldn't eat at
2) There was no way for me to book an intercity bus ticket
I eventually managed to get a bus ticket by sweet-talking someone in a shop to use their personal UPI account in exchange for cash.
I fear there's going to be more problems like this for travellers as communities go cashless around the world.
Booking bus tickets - RedBus and other portals accept credit cards. To use cash one must book at the terminal.
Deleted Comment
These days i'm more pragmatic. I have exactly 2 wired machines, and everything else runs Wifi. The network "rack" is simply a firewall and a 16 port POE switch, everything else network related has been retired to the closet.
My NAS is gone. With electricity frequently going above €1/kWh last winter, it seemed like a bad idea to have a NAS sitting there, consuming ~35 kWh/month. Instead i spent about €20/month on cloud storage, and simply upload everything to the cloud (encrypted with Cryptomator), and i have redundant cloud storage (different provider) included in the cost which is where my backup goes.
All that's left at home is a small ARM based machine that handles making daily backups of my cloud data locally, as well as run a small Plex library on a single USB3 external drive.
Besides saving about half my previous electricity cost (as well as all the hardware cost!), i have gained SO MUCH spare time. My firewall is completely closed (save a wireguard VPN), and i no longer have to maintain anything except the normal patch routines.
[0]: https://danielmangum.com/posts/a-three-year-bet-on-chip-desi...
Someone below brought up "when the iphone first came out it was 2G, was only on AT&T" - well, yeah, and those were very valid initial shortcomings that Apple pretty quickly rectified.
With the Vision Pro, I see very few comments putting down the actual technological achievements here. Comments seem to be pretty universal in thinking this is the best VR device there is. But the valid question is people are still having a difficult time imagining real, extended use cases where it doesn't feel like a novelty.
Personally, I think it's great Apple took a swing at this. I wouldn't be willing to bet one way or the other on its success, I think there are lots of unknowns, but I don't really have anything but high praise for the folks that built this.