Readit NewsIf I eat something unexpected, I have it recalculate what I need for the rest of the day. If I were planning on 8 ounces of chicken for dinner but had an unplanned snack, it might tell me that 6 ounces will suffice now, and I now have room for more fat, so I could add some cheese. I find it quite accurate in this.
Where it loses accuracy is over time. Even when focused on just a single day, the cumulative totals can be wrong when the context window gets too large. I catch this by mentally adding up the numbers it spits out. If the numbers seem off, I open a new chat. Also, it’s not reliable for looking back over multiple days or trying to track long-term patterns.
When I take a photo of a meal (like when eating out), it performs very well. I ask it to list the contents of the plate, then I correct any assumptions. Once corrected, the resulting macros are usually within 5% accuracy. I also tell it the quality of the ingredients and restaurant overall, which can help a bit.
Revolutionary.
The executive branch removing even the concept of stability and predictability from the US markets has nothing to do with it. It's that darn press and the Democrats!
Want to have a good idea of the costs of your business inputs? Sorry, not possible. You have to guess if it's going to be roughly the same or 50% more in a week. You have to sit and wait for what one man decides. That's a great environment for running a business.
https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/unsafe-at-any-speed-dr...
mirror: https://old.bitchute.com/video/QQfIo75KHII/
mirror: https://open.spotify.com/episode/1Sr3OsGqwfnWMfE7bGT30I
It was the sixth leading cause in 2020 before anybody was vaccinated. It was unbelievably easy to check this. It makes me wonder why you didn't bother.
It's called the "spoils system" and it's still very much alive and very common among leftists in the US, eg New York State and City.
Truth will tamp down the anger, mostly because you'd be angry all the time and get exhausted. I recommend books, personally. "Tales from the Sausage Factory: Making Laws in New York State" for example discusses your topic. You will have to really, really put in work in to be angry at [checks notes] Trump or anyone anywhere near associated with the GOP.
Just fyi he did, the court kept claiming he had to produce documents / analytics he said he didn’t have. There’s no evidence the documents ever existed, but judge disagreed, so they issued a default judgement (ie no trial).
https://www.npr.org/2021/11/15/1055864452/alex-jones-found-l...
They then had a jury trial to determine damages were in the billions (lol)
https://www.npr.org/2024/06/07/nx-s1-4996347/alex-jones-liqu...
And lost in all this is what jones actually did… which in my judgement is not even liable and we wouldn’t even know because a trial was never held —
https://www.mediamatters.org/alex-jones/here-exactly-what-al...
Which, sure I think is nuts. But I don’t see anything in there besides his opinion and trying to support his bat shit crazy opinion. So what, he thinks it was a fake event. As far as I can tell from this (and perhaps I’m missing something), he didn’t do anything to anyone. If we start penalizing calling people a liar, we’re going to end up in a much worse place where all we have are liars
Also FYI 'a trial was never held' is a common talking point used by Alex Jones on his program. He and his lawyers are responsible for there not being a trial. Their conduct guaranteed that there was no trial. It's a farce for him to complain about something that he is responsible for.
Off-topic: I keep clicking on the X logo trying to close the pop-ups. This X rebrand doesn't feel like an improvement
> If two accounts did this five times, the researchers took this as a sign that they were automated accounts.
It sounds like they were pretty specific in how they identified the bot accounts.
Deleted Comment