The leisure the author speaks of may be their own, and the research of which they speak today may be done by a machine.
I think the intent is good, and if you as the reader get insight from it, then it is still valid, but I cannot read it, because I don’t feel a thread of consciousness helping me experience life with them.
If an author chose to instead pair with an LLM to research on their own and write themselves about it, perhaps it would be different.
Why do these posts keep getting to the front and even to the top of the HN feed? We are no better than machines, I guess.
Well, our minds aren’t but we have legs and arms which is cool. But maybe that will change too.
It is as if -- I have greatly narrowed my interest such that most books are not interesting any more. Even the sci-fi and fantasy books, once I loved, lost their magic.
Nowadays there are only two types of books that excite me: 1) those about software/hardware engineering, such as iWoz(I even bought a few Tom Swift JR books for my son), Showstopper and Soul of the New Machine, and 2) books about existentialism such as Shestov's philosophy books.
I suspect it has something to do with getting older and getting kid(s).
What about you guys?