Readit News logoReadit News

Deleted Comment

Deleted Comment

Deleted Comment

naringas commented on Evolutionary biologist slays the beast of Individualism   nautil.us/issue/98/mind/i... · Posted by u/dnetesn
naringas · 5 years ago
but with individualism we can form a better collective.

however it is harder to do, takes longer to get there, and there are some tough patches on the way.

because quality takes time and effort (and always encounters failure along its path). it's just more expensive to do things that way.

naringas commented on The Decline and Fall of the Latin Neuter   dannybate.com/2021/03/15/... · Posted by u/who-knows
leephillips · 5 years ago
No, it is correct that there are no neuter nouns in Spanish. That’s all it says. And you are very incorrect about “lo”. You can’t read a page of Spanish without encountering it several times.
naringas · 5 years ago
but the vast majority of those "lo" would be the male article not the neuter.
naringas commented on The Decline and Fall of the Latin Neuter   dannybate.com/2021/03/15/... · Posted by u/who-knows
jgwil2 · 5 years ago
Surprised the article didn't mention the Spanish definite article lo, which can be paired with a masculine adjective to form a nominal phrase meaning the abstract notion of the adjective: lo mismo - the same [thing], lo bueno - the good, that which is good. My understanding is this derives from the Latin neuter as well.

Edit: why on earth is this being downvoted? Seriously confused - is something here wrong or controversial?

naringas · 5 years ago
while the article is factually incorrect when claiming that Spanish has no neutral gender at all.

It's also true that "lo" is seldom used in Spanish and there are almost no neutral nouns (like in german).

naringas commented on Free Software: An idea whose time has passed?   medium.com/@r0ml/free-sof... · Posted by u/altsalt
naringas · 5 years ago
there's a steady droll of anti-free software going on.

I take it to mean that commercial interests are stronger that potential gains enabled by new technological forms of collaboration. We (as a society) are 'choosing' to keep all gains enabled by digital technology private rather than revising the capitalist apparatus which is strained by these new digital possibilities.

naringas commented on Accountancy Is the Priesthood of Modern Life (2020)   blind-spots.org/2020/11/0... · Posted by u/ColPanic
xyzelement · 5 years ago
I am guessing you are seeing the parallel because both sentences have the words "have to hire" in them?

Companies need to hire lawyers because we live in a society that places a high value on playing by the rules and regulations that come down (idealistically) from an elected body.

So if I am a company that "has to" hire lawyers and accountants, I only "have to" do so because there are rules in my country about how I (for example) represent my financial situation to unsophisticated investors so they don't lose their shirts.

You can see how that's a different form of "have to" from hiring someone's uncle so your business doesn't get closed by the corrupt government?

naringas · 5 years ago
I was assuming that there would be law in China that clearly stated this as a legal requirement?

Also, I have this perspective in which, given the case that this is a corrupt practice, it ends up as a form of taxation (corrupt taxation, but same thing from an certain business perspective).

naringas commented on Accountancy Is the Priesthood of Modern Life (2020)   blind-spots.org/2020/11/0... · Posted by u/ColPanic
naringas · 5 years ago
I was thinking about a comment I read here, that claimed that in China companies have to hire party members because is the politically correct thing to do.

And that got me thinking how in "the west" companies have to hire lawyers (and accountants) for legal compliance reasons.

I see a parallel there.

naringas commented on Wendy Carlos on Bob Moog (2005)   wendycarlos.com/moog/inde... · Posted by u/fipar
TheOtherHobbes · 5 years ago
The impact of synthesizers is already over. They were used far more imaginatively in the 70s than they are today.

The real future is software, especially composition integrated with DSP. Not aimless generative nonsense based on randomly reshuffling arrays and maybe snapping them to a harmonic grid, but complex, composed architectures of sound.

Some of them may not even have a bass drum on every quarter beat - a bit radical, but who knows what the future holds?

naringas · 5 years ago
microtonal harmonic grids free from the rigors of 12-tet (i.e. midi, i.e. the keyboard)

but don't get me wrong, 12-tet is an incredible accomplishment on its own. but it's what it is because of (now obsolete) physical constraints of instrument building.

I've been trying to think about how to go beyond 12 tet for years. I recently read this quote on a (unrelated nothing to do with music) book[1] "So it's a bit like a piano that has a meta-key that lets you add new keys." which summarizes my goal better than I've ever been able to.

[1] https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Don%27t+Teach+Coding%3A+Until+Yo...

u/naringas

KarmaCake day1240August 14, 2007View Original