Dead Comment
I've wasted enough time on this. You obviously have no intention of adding any sort of evidence for this argument. Thank you for giving me a reason to read more deeply about the origins of modern alphabets, but I'll continue that reading on my own.
I do not know why you insist on arguing against something no one has suggested, or what so terrifies you about the simple idea I wrote that you are motivated to vicious accusations of "edenism", but I no longer care. You have revealed all we need to know.
Dead Comment
I can’t figure out if he seemed to be a sex crazed maniac because he had a lot of sex and drugs, or a sex crazed maniac because he never got laid. Probably the latter. A lot of the other attitudes follow…
One of life’s little mysteries.
Heinlein had a medical condition that progressively blocked blood flow in his brain. He increasingly needed themes that would increase his blood pressure to be able to write at all. He finally got surgery.
Dead Comment
That doesn't make sense to me. Maybe they did and you don't know about it.
You may say nobody can prove a negative, but cocksure deniers are fairly swarming out of the woodwork, here.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/sensational-runest...
Older examples would generally be expected to more closely resemble whatever they came from. Is this unfamiliar reasoning?