Readit NewsTo me, that workflow is no more arduous than what one would do with apt/rpm - rebuild package & install, or just install.
How does one do it on nix? Bump version in a config and install? Seems similar
Doing all that with containers is a spaghetti soup of custom scripts.
Even if one day you could just squirt the cocktail directly into your receptors or otherwise trick them, there's more to happiness as a part of life than turning yourself into a vegetable, but I digress.
If there can be a solution that works for more languages: great. I mostly want this for Go. If it means there will be some _reasonable_ limitations, that's also fine.
Another option is to do `ssh -L 32400:localhost:32400 <your-plex-address>` and connect to http://localhost:32400/web, it will let you claim the server as it detects the connection being local.
And no, requirement changes don't have to cause that to happen and they don't have to wreak havoc throughout your application due to poor design decisions.
It's fine to encode rules directly into the type system, but only for rules that are known to be fixed (or at least not likely to ever change) throughout the lifetime of the project. For many business rules, however, this unfortunately doesn't apply.
Rules that are not fixed but still are a requirement for code to work/make sense still merit an explicit encoding in the type system. You can have an interpreter somewhere that makes sense of unstructured data and delegates to the right functions once it's able to parse and slap a type on it, which will be better than a function that has a bunch of conditionals laying around which at some point either force you to duplicate them or make assumptions you're calling the right functions in the right order.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regime
Relevant quote: "In politics, a regime (also spelled régime) is a system of government that determines access to public office, and the extent of power held by officials. The two broad categories of regimes are democratic and autocratic."
It is true that as a term it has accrued some negative connotations due to the frequent use of the all-encompassing "regime" to speak of governments where their exact denomination tends to fall on the autocratic side of things. From a journalistic point of view, it is better to use a neutral term than a charged one; which unfortunately as you've noticed yourself it can taint the term to readers who are not familiar with its exact scope.
But it is correct to call it Biden's regime, just like the current administration (perhaps a better term given its popularity in the US) is part of Trump's regime.