Readit News“ (III): Convention relative to the Opening of Hostilities[26][27] This convention sets out the accepted procedure for a state making a declaration of war. It provides the basis on which, in international law, war reparations may be demanded.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hague_Conventions_of_1899_an...
“ (III): Convention relative to the Opening of Hostilities[26][27] This convention sets out the accepted procedure for a state making a declaration of war. It provides the basis on which, in international law, war reparations may be demanded.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hague_Conventions_of_1899_an...
I can only guess the wikipedia article is only a summary and the real convention could be around who is to blame for the war and other factors. Otherwise that's just so ridiculous that it actually encourages declaring wars on countries!
US is an evil empire.
They do. Most people do. If anyone is serious about putting a project up they use frameworks.
Does it actually matter though? Much of the world hasn't bought western sh
t for decades and it hasn't really made a dent in any of the west's operations or goals.China has proven they are just another sh*tty wannabe knockoff of the west (see BRICS and when countries default). They aren't any better.
Dead Comment
I think the downvotes comes from then accusing the person writing it of clickbait. So while it's fine to not know the accurate definition of a word, it's not so fine to accuse the author of something because you don't know the accurate definition.
> A textbook definition of forgery is the making of a false document with the intent that it should be used or acted upon as if it's genuine.
Notice the "with the intent that it should be ACTED upon", and given no one would be using a historic fake ID to use it for access, I think I have a point. Anyway..