Readit Newshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_top-level_dom...
Not sure how advocating for more people is selfish, but okay.
> More people also means more energy need, more recourses use, more garbage too. There is not unlimited recourses to exploits.
Energy can be practically infinite. Simply requires us to use nuclear power. Yes, Yes, there's issues of waste with that. It's overblown and a moral panic.
More resources are used. Yes. However, thinking of it on a universal scale, even resources are "infinite".
That's what i mean. Resources and Energy are practically infinite when you look at it on a long term scale.
I simply don't think, it's a good idea to advocate for humanity to simply reduce and fizzle out. No. Why should we? We should advance life forward. That does not mean in the same way as before. We can do better. But advocating for the reduction of humanity, of life, is wrong in my opinion.
After all, there is no other life we know of out there like us. Why stop?
That's what people thought about oil, trees, etc. before.
Now I don't need to worry about charging my watch every week nor do I have to think about finicky software.
The best tools are the ones that do their job so well you rarely have to think about them.