Readit News logoReadit News

Dead Comment

lezojeda commented on The Junior Hiring Crisis   people-work.io/blog/junio... · Posted by u/mooreds
strickjb9 · 24 days ago
Adding to this: it's not just that the apprenticeship ladder is gone—it's that nobody wants to deal with juniors who spit out AI code they don't really understand.

In the past, a junior would write bad code and you'd work with them to make it better. Now I just assume they're taking my feedback and feeding it right back to the LLM. Ends up taking more of my time than if I'd done it myself. The whole mentorship thing breaks down when you're basically collaborating with a model through a proxy.

I think highly motivated juniors who actually want to learn are still valuable. But it's hard to get past "why bother mentoring when I could just use AI directly?"

I don't have answers here. Just thinking maybe we're not seeing the end of software engineering for those of us already in it—but the door might be closing for anyone trying to come up behind us.

lezojeda · 24 days ago
Some juniors are even using AI for communication in Slack channels or even DMs. It's so uncanny.

Dead Comment

Dead Comment

lezojeda commented on The Programmer Identity Crisis   hojberg.xyz/the-programme... · Posted by u/imasl42
Etheryte · 2 months ago
In my opinion this is another case where people look at it as a technical problem when it's actually a people problem. If someone does it once, they get a stern message about it. If it happens twice, it gets rejected and sent to their manager. Regardless of how you authored a pull request, you are signing off on it with your name. If it's garbage, then you're responsible.
lezojeda · 2 months ago
What do you do if the manager enables it?

Dead Comment

Dead Comment

lezojeda commented on "Vibe code hell" has replaced "tutorial hell" in coding education   blog.boot.dev/education/v... · Posted by u/wagslane
whatever1 · 3 months ago
Organizations now generate 10x the amount of code, because everyone can do it.

But we have exactly the same number of reviewers. How the heck are we gonna deal with it when we cannot use LLMs for sanity checking LLM code?

Like literally yesterday I had a not-technical person who used codex to build an optimization algorithm, and due to the momentum it gained I was asked to “fix the rough edges and help with scaling”.

The entire thing was trash (was trying to do naive search in a combinatorial problem with 1000s of integers, and was violating constraints with high probability, including the integrality). I had to spend all my day reviewing it and make a technical presentation to their leadership that it is just a polished turd.

lezojeda · 3 months ago
It's basically a scheme letting less scrupulous people offload work on others while at the same time making good impressions to manager, PMs and CEOs who want to automate our job and fire us.
lezojeda commented on The email they shouldn't have read   it-notes.dragas.net/2025/... · Posted by u/miniBill
megiddo · 3 months ago
What's the point of this story? Bad actors win?

Here's a hot take: Name and Shame.

If this story is true, the author should be shouting their names from the rooftop.

Instead, we get this nonsense.

lezojeda · 3 months ago
It's so easy to demand a name and shame when you won't be the one facing potential social and economic consequences of doing so.

Dead Comment

u/lezojeda

KarmaCake day258June 22, 2020
About
https://lojeda.co/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/lezojeda/
View Original