However, that code will slowly become out-of-date in the form of deprecations, dependency updates, new launchpad features, and a changing tech landscape. If you always want the most up-to-date starting point, that requires another (discounted) purchase, or the ongoing support plan!
Does that make sense?
A pricing table might help here.
》Want unlimited launches of the latest launchpads? Need ongoing support? Reach out to (email)
》Reuse your code as many times as you like.
Is the first one a cloud offering and second referring to self hosted?
An STT model might misrecognize a word, but an audio LLM may understand the true word because of the broad context. A TTS model needs to guess the inflection and it can get it completely wrong, but an audio LLM could understand how to talk naturally and with what tone (e.g. use a higher tone if it's interjecting)
Speaking of interjection, an STT/TTS system will never interject because it relies on VAD and heuristics to guess when to start talking or when to stop, and generally the rule is to only talk after the user stopped talking. An audio LLM could learn how to conversate naturally, avoid taking up too much conversation time or even talk with a group of people.
An audio LLM could also produce music or sounds or tell you what the song is when you hum it. There's a lot of new possibility
I say "could learn" for most of this because it requires good training data, but from my understanding most of these are currently just trained with normal text datasets synthetically turned into voice with TTS, so they are effectively no better than a normal STT/TTS system; it's a good way to prove an architecture but it doesn't demonstrate the full capabilities
You can work around this by the way by sending the output through a checking stage.
So picture -> gpt4o -> out1, picture -> tesseract -> out2, out1,out2 -> llm.
Might work for sound too.
Minimilism is something that is hard to get right on the web. The cliche is people avoid django because it is too complex then hand build all its features anyway over time!
However some jobs are minimal esp. internal dashboards so there is a place for it. You may find fasthtml which is also minimal interesting.
Curious: why Java and not Go? Go seems more in line with being minimal. Especially for deployment.
Deleted Comment
What it may do is change the job requrements. Web/JS has decimated (reduced by 90% or more) MFC C++ jobs after all.
The programmer doesnt just write Python. That is the how... not the what.
Cool project tho