The free speechers are asking for the opposite: this is a situation in which the government should not intervene.
when the government shouldn't intervene? when there's hate speech against Muslims or when the Muslims retaliate?
Dead Comment
The free speechers are asking for the opposite: this is a situation in which the government should not intervene.
when the government shouldn't intervene? when there's hate speech against Muslims or when the Muslims retaliate?
Dead Comment
can an AI debug/profile/.. entire distributed backend, find what's wrong and add at least one integration test so it won't happen again?
can an AI setup all the devops pipelines, setup monitoring and alerting?
can management trust what an AI spits and put it in prod?
if the answer is no to one or more to the above, then my job is secure.
the better question..
am I using the latest GPTs to do my work and save a lot of time and get more things done? hell yes
I understand it works better for companies too, larger talent pool, reduced costs. The negatively affected entities are neither the employees nor the the employers.
I wonder when are they going to punish the US for occupying Syria and stealing its oil.
The solution is to push even more English education if international scientists want to keep up.
I would have the exact same opinion if Chinese was doing the same.
Speech? Do it freely.
Retaliation? Go to jail.
Of course there are huge caveats to these.
For instance, doxing is speech which I don't think should be protected ("Joe was was a member of the Nazi party and he lives at this address"). There's no debate or formulation of ideas in it. But if you said "All former Nazi party members should be deported". It's hateful but I think it should be protected: it's political, it's abstract, it can be debated.
I understand the stupidity in today's internet is out of proportions, but Muslims themselves burn Quoran to dispose of it. The sole intention of the losers here is to insult a large group of people. The retaliation is coming in several forms including the call to bankrupt such miningless countries and that's a good thing. The exact reason why Denmark and Sweden are banning acts of hate speech against Muslims.
Now you are writing that (selective) hate speech should be free and protected and all retaliations should be banned.. which is funny because it's not how the world works and you don't get to dictate the rules.