Readit News logoReadit News
jjcc commented on How China built its ‘Manhattan Project’ to rival the West in AI chips   japantimes.co.jp/business... · Posted by u/artninja1988
notepad0x90 · 10 days ago
Good for them, I don't see this as a big deal other than my fear of west china invading china (taiwan! :) ).

Don't get me wrong, I want the west to succeed, but a competition from China is exactly what is needed. They're building datacenters in arizona and india for TSMC because of this competition.

I really hope we get past historical political rivalry and get along with China better. Competition is good, hostility sucks.

jjcc · 10 days ago
Give you some more historical context: China (ROC) planned to invade west China until the plan was given up in 60's. Both sides wanted reunification by force. When China's navy and air force was superior in early 1950's, it tried to "establish blockade of trade with west China (PRC) along the Chinese coast" (1)

China eventually gave up the plan in 1960's not because it didn't want to but because the balance of the power weighting over to west China. In 80's and 90's both agree to make peace given the premise that both sides belong to China.

TSMC was a product of industry policy from None-democratic China government. The founder Morris Chang , an American born in the west China ,never visited China before 50 years old.

Both China (before 90') and west China used to want reunification , by force or not. China changed a bit later. The motivation of west China to invade China has little to do with chips although US thought that's the critical incentive. West China will still let TSMC provide the chips to the world in case it would have successfully invaded China in my view.

1.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capture_of_the_Tuapse

jjcc commented on Roomba maker goes bankrupt, Chinese owner emerges   news.bloomberglaw.com/ban... · Posted by u/nreece
expedition32 · 14 days ago
It's funny that we are running into the same problem that the British had with China in the 19th century:

China doesn't need or want anything from the West, they do not trust the West and they certainly do not want to rely on the West.

The last time the British came up with the ingenuous opium plan. But that backfired into the communist takeover in 1949.

jjcc · 13 days ago
>But that backfired into the communist takeover in 1949.

This is very insightful. But it's more profound than what's observed on surface. There was a chain of reactions along with many coincident events.

If we consider a collection of human bounded by different glues, i.e. tribes, culture, religions, ethnicities , political beliefs, cooperate, LLCs, etc., as a new form of creature superior to nature animals, then Chinese as a new creature is very special one. Maybe next to Jews.

The failure of Opium war and consequential changes caused a humiliation that created a special stress on this creature, resulted in a strong response which also drove many revolves inside China. Chinese elites seeking different solutions as reaction to those changes.

One big revolt lead by revolutionaries , the predecessor of the Nationalists who fled to Taiwan in 1949, overthrew the last dynasty of China. However it didn't address the issue of humiliation. The elites continue to seeking solutions while tried to reunite China. CPP was one of them.

After WWII, only 2 contesters survived. Another 4 years of civil war later, the Nationalist lost and Republic of China migrated to Taiwan. In 1971, ROC lost the seat in UN, CPP took over as the representative of China.

Both CPP and the Nationalists are nationalists , among others who lost in the history. The majority of early members of CPP, even strongly believe in the Marxist ideology, deep in their heart they are the same as the other nationalists even they hate and kill each other.

Marxism is a tool which is very effective proved by history, used by the unique creature called China to restore its honor and dignity, without the user of the tool even realizing it. Today it is called "Socialism with Chinese character", a heavily modified and unrecognizable version of Marxist ideology.

That's a little long version of

>that backfired into the communist takeover in 1949

I wish I have time to write a book about it as real long version after some time, maybe 10 years.

jjcc commented on DeepSeek uses banned Nvidia chips for AI model, report says   finance.yahoo.com/news/ch... · Posted by u/goodway
ajsnigrutin · 18 days ago
Did china ban them too? I mean.. why should a chinese company care about american regulation?
jjcc · 18 days ago
Yes. China banned NVidia. Jensen Huang said NVidia is the first one in the history banned by both sides. So Deepseek might find a way to get around Chinese government ban if the claim is true
jjcc commented on China reaches energy milestone by "breeding" uranium from thorium   scmp.com/news/china/scien... · Posted by u/surprisetalk
ragebol · a month ago
China is simply betting on all horses: solar, wind, thorium, batteries, coal even, anything to not buy foreign oil and be as independent, self-sufficient as possible. Seems like it's working too
jjcc · a month ago
Exactly. That's less noticed by many people. Just give you two examples:

1.While China scaled up the EV production, the development of Hydrogen based technology is still going on. There are some progress but lost in the bigger noise of EV.

2.China became the largest automobile exporter, leading by EV. But most people thought that's because EV took over ICE. That's partially true because EV dominate the export. What the most people missing is a quite portion of export are ICE cars. Because the ICE engine from China achieved higher energy transformation efficiency than Japanese and German cars. Again the information was lost in the EV noise.

jjcc commented on Larry Summers resigns from OpenAI board   cnbc.com/2025/11/19/larry... · Posted by u/koolba
legitster · a month ago
Has the name of the woman come out? She's not directly named in their communications.
jjcc · a month ago
Actually she is really smart. Lex had an episode with her.
jjcc commented on What Killed Perl?   entropicthoughts.com/what... · Posted by u/speckx
orev · a month ago
The backwards incompatibility of Perl 6 absolutely killed Perl.

There are many languages still in use today that have all kinds of warts and ugliness, but they remain in use because they still have momentum and lots of legacy things built in them. So being ugly or old isn’t enough of a factor for people to abandon something in droves.

Once you need to rewrite everything, there’s no reason to stay with something you know since you need to fully retool anyway.

As a Perl programmer since v5 was released, the confusion around 6 completely destroyed almost everyone’s enthusiasm, and immediately caused all new projects to avoid Perl. It seemed like 5 had reached the end of the line, and 6 was nowhere to be found. Nobody wants to gamble so many hours of their lives, and the future of their business, on such an uncertain environment.

If Perl 6 had any visible movement within the first few years, it might have survived, but it was a good decade before they even admitted Perl 6 might take longer than expected, and then more time after that before they admitted it should have been a new language. 6 was interesting for language geeks, and they probably did some cool things, but you can’t run a large popular project like it’s a small research project. That completely destroyed all momentum in the community. Perl 5 development only resumed far too late, after the writing was already on the wall.

Both Bill Gates and Linus understand backwards compatibility as a sacrosanct principle. Python only just barely survived the jump from 2 to 3. JavaScript can only survive this because there’s no other option in a browser.

jjcc · a month ago
What we can learn is: evolution is a better choice over revolution given that there's no extreme internal or external pressure.
jjcc commented on My Life in Ambigrammia   theatlantic.com/ideas/arc... · Posted by u/fortran77
d--b · 3 months ago
note the author is Douglas Hofstadter who wrote Godel Escher Bach

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del,_Escher,_Bach

jjcc · 3 months ago
Exactly. Along with a few other books.
jjcc commented on Huawei releases an open weight model trained on Huawei Ascend GPUs   arxiv.org/abs/2505.21411... · Posted by u/buyucu
codedokode · 6 months ago
You mean people are ready to exchange a democracy and freedom for a tiny increase in income?
jjcc · 6 months ago
The founder of SMIC(Zhang Rujing) was a manager from TSMC. He created SMIC not for money but for patriotism because he see himself as Chinese even he was from Taiwan. You can do some research on this guy, especially try to find some Chinese sources with google translation.

The western media has a narrative with many real evidence to support the narrative so most western people take it for granted. But the reality is more complicated. For many engineer money is an important factor for sure but maybe not all.

jjcc commented on Huawei releases an open weight model trained on Huawei Ascend GPUs   arxiv.org/abs/2505.21411... · Posted by u/buyucu
bgnn · 6 months ago
A close friend of mine is Chinese. He went back to China to join a HW start-up as a founding engineer 6 years ago. Then cane the sanctions. He said that was the best thing happened when I recently met him. Their company grew because Huawei and all the other Chinese manufacturers don't want to buy anything from a West-aligned country anymore. Nobody cares about the sanctions anymore apparently as they accepted it as a given, so their focus is self reliance.
jjcc · 6 months ago
The impacts are different sector by sector. Those benefit the most are the small EDA software companies that barely survive before sanctions due to the huge technology gaps behind the large EDA companies like Synopsys. Now they have tones of new customers don't want to take risk of service interruption due to sanction.

It is called hormesis.

jjcc commented on Huawei releases an open weight model trained on Huawei Ascend GPUs   arxiv.org/abs/2505.21411... · Posted by u/buyucu
avn2109 · 6 months ago
>> ... spends the normalized equivalent of America’s defense spending...

I'd be interested in seeing the numbers for that claim broken down if you can cite them. From napkin math it seems hard to make the budgets line up, unless we're doing a very large purchasing power parity adjustment?

jjcc · 6 months ago
There exists such numbers/information circulated mainly inside Chinese (language) media/social media in form of "screenshot" but no links. Screenshot as a way of hiding source is a common format for this type of information because the links will disclose the media that spread the information. Then normal (Chinese) audience will know the credibility of the information. Give you an example, "epoch times" is a common source of such type of information. The nature of the media is well-known to Chinese audience.

The real equivalence to US defense budget in term of size is actually the infrastructure construction budget. While both budgets boost the economy , infrastructure budget improves the life of local people. Now as the most cities in coast areas run out of project to build, the over capacity cultivated in early years is poured to other directions: rural areas, undeveloped provinces, and even overseas especially Africa and Latin America. It's amazing that China changes very fast year by year as I visited some rural areas.

Ionically this behavior of infrastructure building sounds like Chinese MAGA to me: mind our own business, focus on improve ourselves instead of spread values to other countries.

u/jjcc

KarmaCake day344September 6, 2010
About
Try to understand unknown unknown
View Original