Readit News logoReadit News
ihumanable commented on Taco Bell rethinks AI drive-through after man orders 18,000 waters   bbc.com/news/articles/ckg... · Posted by u/speckx
kevin_thibedeau · 5 days ago
Angrily request an operator and threaten to sue. That will elevate the priority if any sentiment analysis is in place and get you into the queue for a human.
ihumanable · 5 days ago
There used to be some automated systems that would detect curse words and escalate you.

It seems to work less these days, but in the past I would get a robot voice on the other end and just calmly start going “piss shit fuck damn ass” and it would connect me to a human operator.

ihumanable commented on German court declares Karl Marx's teachings unconstitutional   harici.com.tr/en/german-c... · Posted by u/Anthony-G
lawlessone · 19 days ago
Aren't Marx ideas around value creation etc actually pretty accepted by capitalists?

edit: As someone else has pointed out title is a bit click baity

ihumanable · 18 days ago
A lot of what Marx writes is pretty straightforward observations about how capitalism functions.

If profit isn’t the excess value of labor then where does it come from. You’ve got some inputs, you transform them into some outputs, you sell the outputs for more than the inputs. Something happened to make the output more valuable than the input.

And it seems hard to argue against that idea. Capitalism as a system describes who should get to allocate that value and as the name would suggest, it’s the people with the capital. If you own the factory you get to pay people to do work, they convert low value inputs into higher value outputs, and as the person with the capital you get to capture the difference as profit.

Marx simply looks at this system and says, why should they get to decide what happens with the value that got created by labor.

That tends to be where it goes from an objective “this is how this system operates” to “here’s an alternative system”

I think people would serve themselves well to read what he had to write. Even if you come away thinking the alternative doesn’t work, the analysis of capitalisms strengths and weaknesses is interesting.

As life becomes more unaffordable for many under a capitalist system, as rent seeking and exploitation become more rampant, people are going to want to critically analyze whether this system is really all it’s cracked up to be. Why do some go hungry while Jeff Bezos has more than he can ever use? Why do the wealthy get to have an outsized say in our society and our governments? Can the set of incentives that capitalism erects survive a condition like climate change?

When we decide that people are no longer allowed to ask those questions, we need not worry about the a theoretical dictatorship of the proletariat. Ask only who you are not allowed to question to see who is in charge.

No system should be above examination and reformation for the good of humanity.

ihumanable commented on Doge-affiliated employee expected to seek access to IRS system   nbcnews.com/politics/doge... · Posted by u/doener
anon2549 · 7 months ago
Isn't it funny, then, that when the Democrats had all three branches of government, the Republicans remained a reasonably effective opposition.

The Democrats are failing at that, and it's wrong to say that's because they're actually powerless. They aren't. What they are is ineffective.

ihumanable · 7 months ago
They aren't ineffective so much as the thing they are attempting to do is not what they say.

The democratic party is controlled opposition. Democrats, like Republicans, take in a ton of money from the donor class.

America is a capitalist nation, in capitalism, those with the capital get to reap the profits. The people with the capital therefore end up with more money, and they can use that money to donate to the political class. This causes the political class to become an instrument of the capital class, and the parties end up being marketing.

The goals of the democratic and republican parties both end up to serve capital. Republicans have an easier time since they have incorporated serving capital into their political platform. Democrats end up seeming ineffective because their messaging is that they are somehow taking most of their money from the capital class but are actually on the side of the labor class.

The capital class has the money, but the labor class has the numbers, both parties need the numbers because until we completely do away with democracy, people, not dollars, get to vote.

As the democratic party has become more and more captured by the capital class and their donations, they can no longer seek votes through advancing policies that would support the labor class by restraining the capital class (this would make their donors unhappy). The democratic party pivoted to trying to find a way to carve out least-bad pro-capital class reforms (things like public-private partnerships, school vouchers, etc), least-disruptive pro-labor class reforms (entrenching capital class insurance companies as some kind of improvement to healthcare, slow rolling minimum wage so they could have symbolic victories for keeping up with inflation, and then not even doing that), and more and more towards cultural issues that do not threaten the capital class (LGBTQ+ rights, DEI, etc).

Republicans have adopted populism and wedge issues politics to capture the labor class vote.

The reason the democrats are terrible opposition isn't because we've somehow elected the dumbest people imaginable, it's that they are pointing at a different goal. Their goal is to remain in the political class, to keep the donations of the donor class (which just happens to be the capital class) flowing, and if that class says "let the massive tax cuts for us play out, we don't care about the fallout" that's what they will do.

ihumanable commented on The young, inexperienced engineers aiding DOGE   wired.com/story/elon-musk... · Posted by u/medler
ihumanable · 7 months ago
Ah yes, when that famous Democrat, Richard Nixon, put together the EPA in his dastardly leftist plot to destroy America.
ihumanable commented on The young, inexperienced engineers aiding DOGE   wired.com/story/elon-musk... · Posted by u/medler
ihumanable · 7 months ago
People like Musk dislike the government because people have a say. That say is imperfect and often corrupted, but people get to have some amount of input. They can vote, and organize, and they could decide that they'd rather have roads or water or any number of silly things that get in his way.

Companies are not democracies, Musk says "get rid of the supercharger team" and no one gets a vote, they just get rid of them. We should all be worried about what goals he efficiently wants to achieve, if you or I were in the way, would he care.

The danger is in the unchecked nature of this power, even if someone likes Elon Musk and thinks he's a brilliant genius, what gives him the right to supplant the will of the people with his own.

Elon has shown time and again that he will prioritize what HE wants, and if that means some people don't have jobs, well that's just fine. If that means that people should have to sleep on the factory floor and wake up and make cars he can profit off of and then back to sleep on the factory floor, that's also just fine. If that means that USAID doesn't feed the hungry, that's also just fine.

And maybe to anyone reading this that's happy with what he's done, you are just fine with it too. But what happens when he decides something you do care about is alright to destroy too to meet his goals, he's just fine with it. What do you do then? How confident are you that your goals and his will stay aligned, forever, that the ax of "efficiency" won't come for you and yours someday. And if that day comes, what will you say to the people that tell you "he's a brilliant genius and he's fine with it so so am I"

ihumanable commented on The young, inexperienced engineers aiding DOGE   wired.com/story/elon-musk... · Posted by u/medler
ihumanable · 7 months ago
The handmaid's tale is a book, a work of fiction about politics.

Many works of fiction provide political commentary.

There's no actual invisible hand of the free market either, just some pop-culture metaphor by some Scottish guy.

ihumanable commented on The young, inexperienced engineers aiding DOGE   wired.com/story/elon-musk... · Posted by u/medler
bobsmooth · 7 months ago
I trust him to be transparent because of his transparency? Yes.
ihumanable · 7 months ago
Did you know that someone can tell lots of lies all the time. Telling a lot of lies all the time would look identical to transparency. Hell even just talking a lot about things that are true but are not at all important or your priorities would look like transparency.

Just because someone won't shut up doesn't mean they are telling you their true intentions.

ihumanable commented on Starship Flight 7   spacex.com/launches/missi... · Posted by u/chinathrow
artemonster · 8 months ago
I like how chopsticks catch (a very impressive feat) completely distracts everyone from totally fucked timeline and already spent budget on mars mission. Its like any criticism is being drowned in loud cheers. Only time will tell, but I hope I will be wrong on this one
ihumanable commented on In the belly of the MrBeast   kevinmunger.substack.com/... · Posted by u/stafford_beer
kccoder · 8 months ago
I made the mistake of clicking on a Jordan Peterson video several years back. I'd never heard of him before and the title seemed interesting, so I clicked. 15 seconds in my charlatan detector went off, so I exited the video. For the next couple weeks I was playing wack-a-mole with a never-ending supply of manoshpere and right wing nonsense. Easy to see how so many people get sucked into sphere of influence.
ihumanable · 8 months ago
One of the best things I've learned is that you can go into your watch history and remove something and that seems to work pretty well to fixing the algorithm after clicking on something and realizing it's garbage.
ihumanable commented on In the belly of the MrBeast   kevinmunger.substack.com/... · Posted by u/stafford_beer
hylaride · 8 months ago
Youtube is also killing a lot of history channels because if there's any violence (eg war) they get demonetized, the algorithm avoids them, or they can even have their channels disabled. Most now blur out pictures of the holocaust, which negates a lot of the otherwise serious impact on a serious subject.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24QgMpvX3mw

ihumanable · 8 months ago
I enjoy the occasional true crime documentary. It's been amazing to watch YouTube demonetization just drive censorship to an absurd degree.

No blood, no violence, no bad words. And the words YouTube deems bad are somehow much stricter than what I grew up with. Many words related to violence (abuse, assault, etc) words related to death (killed, executed, etc) words related to drugs (took me a while to figure out what a suspect was even saying when their speech was censored to "they drank and used s**d" I finally figured out it was speed aka meth)

It's amazing to see how sanitized things have become, almost to the point of absurdity. Does making it so that people can't say the word "abuse" somehow eliminate abuse from the world?

u/ihumanable

KarmaCake day1888April 20, 2009
About
Software Engineer, lots of languages, focusing on Elixir
View Original