SomosAzúcar has supported open education and children’s digital literacy initiatives across Latin America since 2009.
The domain expired on 2025-10-06, but due to a Postfix configuration issue on sugarlabs.org, GoDaddy’s renewal notices never reached us.
By the time we discovered the problem — about 35 days after expiration — GoDaddy informed us that the domain was already being prepared for auction, and that the only way to recover it would be to bid for it like any other buyer.
It feels wrong that a long-standing nonprofit project could lose its .org domain over a technical mail glitch.
Has anyone here faced something similar with GoDaddy or other registrars?
Is there any way to appeal to PIR (.org registry) or GoDaddy executive support to restore the domain before it’s auctioned?
Any advice or contacts would be deeply appreciated — this domain represents more than 15 years of open education work.
I put a lot of effort into it - it integrates with `llm` command line tool and with your desktop, via a tray icon and nice chat window.
I recently released 3.0.0 with packages for all three major desktop operating systems.
That's why everybody else either rerenders (such as rich) or relies on the whole buffer (such as glow).
I didn't write Streamdown for fun - there are genuinely no suitable tools that did what I needed.
Also various models have various ideas of what markdown should be and coding against CommonMark doesn't get you there.
Then there's other things. You have to check individual character width and the language family type to do proper word wrap. I've seen a number of interesting tmux and alacritty bugs in doing multi language support
The only real break I do is I render h6 (######) as muted grey.
Compare:
for i in $(seq 1 6); do
printf "%${i}sh${i}\n\n-----\n" | tr " " "#";
done | pv -bqL 30 | sd -w 30
to swapping out `sd` with `glow`. You'll see glow's lag - waiting for that EOF is annoying.Also try sd -b 0.4 or even -b 0.7,0.8,0.8 for a nice blue. It's a bit easier to configure than the usual catalog of themes that requires a compilation after modification like with pygments.
You triggered my curiosity. The chat window takes consistently 2.28s to start. The python interpreter takes roughly 30ms to start. I'll be doing some profiling.