Readit NewsDead Comment
https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/j523qi/whats_...
I found this point interesting:
"The thing about old photos is that everything about the image is part of the information we can learn from it—not just the picture itself and what it's a picture of, but how it was composed, what its medium was, the balance of lights and darks... It's all part of the document. And when you start to alter it, that's creating a new document reflecting a conjunction between the past and the present. "
The material is already hugely compromised as a historical document of the reality on the day the events were captured. Let's not put it on a pedestal. For example, if we remove the effect of hand-cranking on film to make it more watchable, are we destroying or enhancing? I would argue the latter. The hand-cranking adds little of value.
Haven't recent discoveries undermined this theory?
Not if you're part of the massive destruction of wildlife wrought by these biodiversity annihilators masquerading as cute pets.
'As an invasive species[1] and superpredator,[2] they do considerable ecological damage.[2] In Australia, hunting by cats helped to drive at least 20 native mammals to extinction,[3] and continues to threaten at least 124 more.[3] Their introduction has caused the extinction of at least 33 endemic species on islands throughout the world.[2] Feral and domestic cats kill billions of birds in the United States every year, where songbird populations continue to decline.[4]'