Strong agree. Needs another pass or two at editing though, some painful LLM-os sticking out there :'(
Readit Newselliotbnvl commented on Grief and the AI split blog.lmorchard.com/2026/0... · Posted by u/avernet
For sure, leave the hype profiteers alone!
And the people that still get excited about life!
I feel like this is a feature which improves the perceived confidence of the LLM but doesn't do much for correctness of other outputs, i.e. an exacerbation of the "confidently incorrect" criticism.
It's a usability / quality of life feature to me. Nothing to do with increasing perceived confidence. I guess it depends on how much you already (dis)trust LLMs.
I'm finding more and more often the limiting factor isn't the LLM, it's my intuition. This goes a way towards helping with that.
Article: https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-4/
gpt-5.4
Input: $2.50 /M tokens
Cached: $0.25 /M tokens
Output: $15 /M tokens
---
gpt-5.4-pro
Input: $30 /M tokens
Output: $180 /M tokens
Wtf
Looks like it's an order of magnitude off. Missprint?
> style="opacity:0;transform:translateY(20px)"
In my opinion, that’s a bigger problem than CORS. Proxyless web feed reader is a lost cause, you’re wasting your time because only a small minority are ever going to support it. But that opacity and transition nonsense gratuitously slows down page loading for everyone, and hides content completely for those that aren’t running JS.
(What I would also like to know is: how come this is the third time I’ve seen exactly this—each block of content having this exact style attribute—in the past month, when I don’t remember encountering exactly it before?)
This is something Opus 4.6 likes to generate a LOT for some reason.
Hi all, author here. Please don't go to this website. It's expensive for me. It's a realtime multiplayer text-to-website chat, powered by Sonnet 4.6, that I built to showcase the incredible agency and speed frontier models have attained. I am paying API costs out-of pocket. Call it a business expense?
It's inspired by Pieter Levels' tweet about chatting with his websites. [1]
It uses the same tool under the hood as the core web offering, bareclaw [2], a thin Claude Code CLI wrapper I created to enable custom CC client creation while leveraging your Claude Max subscription.
[1] https://x.com/levelsio/status/2023960543959101938 [2] https://github.com/elliotbonneville/bareclaw
elliotbnvl commented on Following 35% growth, solar has passed hydro on US grid arstechnica.com/science/2... · Posted by u/rbanffy
I have a goal of setting up solar on my property in the woods that goes directly to a wall of batteries, maybe Tesla, maybe something else. But definitely not going back into the grid. Does anybody have suggestions or advice on how to do this?
Who are the best companies doing this right now in New England? What products are folks using to store electricity? Are there any good resources for this kind of thing?
elliotbnvl commented on Claude Code Remote Control code.claude.com/docs/en/r... · Posted by u/empressplay
I really enjoyed reading both posts. Thanks for sharing!
I, like many others, have written my own "claw" implementation, but it's stagnated a bit. I use it through Slack, but the idea of journaling with it is compelling. Especially when combined with the recent "two sentence" journaling article[1] that floated through HN not too long ago.
[1] https://alexanderbjoy.com/two-sentence-journal-approaches/
Happy you liked it! Always really nice to get positive feedback.
I’ll have to check out the journaling article. I’ve been journaling a lot more lately!