Because people are interested in how technology is built, and if they’re interested in rust they might be interested in seeing how it’s used in other projects
sure that "being written in C" or in "PHP" would have gathered far less interest
Software written in C continues to be riddled with elementary security holes, despite being written and reviewed by experts. If anything the push to rewrite is too weak, we have known about the dangers for decades at this point.
We aren't destroying software, it was never all that. The software of the 90s was generally janky in a way that would never be tolerated today.
Also I find it disingenuous that apologists are stating thing close to "you are using it wrong". Where it is advertised that LLM based AI should be more and more trusted (because more accurate, based on some arbitrary metrics) and might save some time ( on some undescribed task).
Of course in that use case most would say to use your judgement to verify whatever is generated, but for the generation that is using AI LLM as a source of knowledge ( like some people are using Wikipedia as source of truth, or stack overflow) it will be difficult to verify, when all they knew is LLM generated content as source of knowledge.