I use YouTube far less than Netflix, Disney, Amazon, bbc, all of which are cheaper. Many YouTube videos come with burnt in adverts too.
I use YouTube far less than Netflix, Disney, Amazon, bbc, all of which are cheaper. Many YouTube videos come with burnt in adverts too.
It’s expensive, but I’ve done it, but it also includes YouTube music which I like.
YouTube music is definitely not as good as Apple Music (or Spotify) but it’s acceptable for the combined cost.
At least the first display's font is fairly distinct, I haven't noticed it elsewhere. The bottom of the capital letters is a pixel lower than the lowercase letters.
Printed signs from Transport for London use Johnston Sans, noticeable with the diamond-shape dots on "i" and "j": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnston_(typeface)
[0]https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2F...
I’d say current automation is ‘good enough’ for most cases, but you wouldn’t rely on it for translating a contract and it would probably still miss a lot of slang and local dialects.
Deleted Comment
It's clear that they intentionally did not release a web application in order to maximize app installs and thus maximum control over their users (eg. scrape your contacts, push notifications, and most importantly to show you ads).
In 2023 nobody wants to install yet another app, so this is a clever strategy to optimize for app installs. Not going to work on me though. If it's just a Twitter clone only accessible to mobile users, then content quality is going to be low because nobody is typing thought provoking, in-depth analysis from their mobile phones.
Are people actually typing thought provoking, in-depth analysis into Twitter?