Deleted Comment
You clearly don't know how copyright around sampling works. Yes rappers are paying shitloads to previous generation musicians for samples they use.
People don’t have a problem that AI is being used in some form to provide the service.
The complaint is pretty clearly that code is being lifted from repositories without attribution or compensation, and being redistributed into other applications.
How impressive the work behind copilot is or is not really isn’t relevant.
This is where some modest taxation comes in. To reallocate a slice of the output of value creation to its actual source in a rough kind of way wherever more direct compensation isn't feasible.
Deleted Comment
Deleted Comment
Or only specific to these apps? I'd like to see the documentation on the "well-documented asymmetry" to believe otherwise, because that's not what I observed.