Between overworked, understaffed ATC and undertrained pilots, I'm expecting some major disasters in the coming years.
This had nothing to do with any of that tho.
Readit Newscschmatzler commented on Ryanair flight landed at Manchester airport with six minutes of fuel left theguardian.com/business/... · Posted by u/mazokum
cschmatzler commented on Claude Code is all you need dwyer.co.za/static/claude... · Posted by u/sixhobbits
When I asked it to add the gallery I also asked it to make sure the images close if you press escape or outside the image. I guess I wasn't thinking about mobile users, but definitely on me, not Claude there :)
*EDIT* prominent close button and closing on back navigation added (probably people will complain about hijackng the back button now)
and again we can tell based on how the x isn’t centered in the close button
cschmatzler commented on Vanilla JavaScript support for Tailwind Plus tailwindcss.com/blog/vani... · Posted by u/ulrischa
It's not very expensive, all things considered. $299 for a single-user perpetual license (includes all future updates too) or about $1k for a team license[1].
If it saves you a bunch of time writing and maintaining the sort of components they are showing off, probably worth it?
Yeah I strongly emphasise with them getting their money - the only problem with headless components being behind a paid license is that you cannot build a design system on top of them and open source it.
Do you have a link to that footage? I've seen speculation on this from very blurry video but nothing like proof.
On the professional pilot forums the consensus guess is inadvertent flap retraction, instead of gear retraction, leading to inability to climb.
A 787 can still climb with flaps up and two healthy engines. In the video that was posted everywhere, you can CLEARLY hear the RAT spin, which gets deployed automatically when both engines go out.
There's footage after takeoff of it descending with the air ram deployed, no engine power, gears down, and flaps up.
TBD on the cause, but loss of engines for some reason seems to be the case.
I do agree that a lot of info comes out first week that isn't all right. I'm just reciting what's been shown in videos.
Both slats and flaps were on maximum during the entire flight.
They should invest and focus on making their platform more reliable. Without that they will continue to be just a hobby toy to play with and nothing more
It’s nice seeing a major outage a day after this.
cschmatzler commented on Arizona woman trapped in Tesla when battery dies azfamily.com/2024/06/19/a... · Posted by u/glitcher
The manual door release couldn't be further from "secret". It's so obvious that almost every first-time passenger thinks it's how you're always supposed to open the door.
Thought the same. I’d say it’s _too_ obvious because every time I have someone new in the passenger seat I have to warn them when they grab it.
Absolutely agree. I love Elixir but the editor integration has always been unfortunately second-class. The happy paths in VSCode work well enough with the ElixirLS, but there are a few flaws that are a quite a bummer. One major one is no rename / refactor functionality (seriously?!) and a more Phoenix-specific issue is trying to contend with auto-complete in templates, which is no fun.
I like VSCode fine, but I'd definitely be interested in a Jetbrains level IDE for Elixir stuff.
Use lexical instead of elixirls and most of your worries will be gone
cschmatzler commented on Super Heavy has splashed down in The Gulf of Mexico twitter.com/SpaceX/status... · Posted by u/thepasswordis
Honest question, did they sink the remaining fuel? Or did they just burnt all remaining fuel whilst hovering? I would imagine that's pretty toxic.
Edit: Thanks for the answers!
Methane and oxygen are not very toxic.
I love that the Erlang guys seem to be so open to Elixir being a big part of their ecosystem even relying on ExDoc for their new documentation system (I think everyone can see it's a big improvement over the brutalist UI that was there before). A lot of software projects would be ego driven rather than pragmatic on something like this.
ExDoc is arguably one of the nicest documentation systems out there, and Erlang moving to it means two things:
1. The Erlang devs do not need to implement and maintain their own anymore.
2. ExDoc will improve faster since people previously working on Erlang’s documentation system shift to it.
It’s really a win for both, and I love it.