Readit News logoReadit News
colemickens commented on GitHub is down   githubstatus.com/?... · Posted by u/tomduncalf
dragonwriter · 6 years ago
If you are sick of participating, don't, and your problem is solved.

Also, if you've been here long enough to get sick of anything you should have learned that dumb downvotes happen, they mostly get reversed over time, and nothing good comes of reacting to them at all, much less throwing a expletive-laden fit about them.

colemickens · 6 years ago
Such great advice, had never thought of that. Thanks!
colemickens commented on Never-Googlers: Web users take the ultimate step to guard their data   thehour.com/news/article/... · Posted by u/sverige
d1zzy · 6 years ago
No but there's a good argument there in terms of priorities.

What is more likely to impact you negatively: Google building an internal profile based on your information and targeting ads based on it or your card information being stolen from insecure smaller vendors?

Obviously those 2 choices are picked arbitrarily but they may explain why the OP chose to prefer the former over the latter. I would think every time we decide to share some of our information we do so because we stand to gain something (otherwise why do it) and it's up to us to decide if what we stand to lose is worth it. As technically minded people we tend to be more focused on technical problems and what we consider more dangerous may be more related to our familiarity with the subject matter rather than the objective potential negative impact it has.

colemickens · 6 years ago
I mean, "my card information being stolen" is literally only an issue because credit card companies won't force US retailers to accept proper chip and pin. It just is not an issue everywhere I've been in Europe because it is categorically impossible for them to steal my card information with contactless payments.

As for the magnitude of privacy invasion regarding financial transactions, I feel very safe in saying the data Google has about/from me is far more revealing than relatively opaque transaction logs.

colemickens commented on GitHub is down   githubstatus.com/?... · Posted by u/tomduncalf
colemickens · 6 years ago
"Currently the owner of the project must be online in order to receive any proposed RSM updates from a contributor. Once received and processed, these updates will be written to IPFS by the project owner, and made available to all users who follow that project." -- http://radicle.xyz/docs/#faq
colemickens · 6 years ago
What the hell? I get downvoted for linking an authoritative answer to the question I was asked? I'm so god damn sick of participating here in good faith and getting wordlessly crapped on for it. The answer supports exactly what I said, and I provided a link.

Pretty obvious someone didn't like one of my other comments and then proceeded to downvote the others they could since I commented in multiple threads at the same time. Why is this nonsense allowed? It would be easy to detect.

Deleted Comment

colemickens commented on New York City to Consider Banning Sale of Cellphone Location Data   nytimes.com/2019/07/23/ny... · Posted by u/johnny313
zucked · 6 years ago
Yeah, that's Android Q, which is in Beta and not widely adopted. The vast majority of Android devices are running on OS's that have way less granular permissions.

I appreciate the move in the right direction, but I suspect that Google is reading the tea leaves to see that they've likely got antitrust on the horizon and they need to start laying the groundwork to fight that.

colemickens · 6 years ago
It's almost like my own comment said I wasn't making excuses and pointed out it was a preview release. I don't know why I bother.

Also, I don't understand what Google being in trouble for anti-trust has to do with a bunch of third-party apps and third-party SDKs accessing and selling my information.

colemickens commented on Never-Googlers: Web users take the ultimate step to guard their data   thehour.com/news/article/... · Posted by u/sverige
phmagic · 6 years ago
(disclaimer: I work at a big tech firm, but I've had this opinion before working here)

I'm confused by the lengths people have gone through to "protect" themselves from internet giants while freely giving away their info to credit card companies, traditional retailers, small businesses. Credit card transaction data have been sold for years without most of us knowing about it. Small startups, boutique stores rarely have the security or data governance resources to ensure your data is stored and used properly. Data breaches are common even at large brick-and-mortar retailers.

Given the state of data security outside of big tech, my best option is to trust only big tech.

colemickens · 6 years ago
How does this argument come up every time? If I can't have absolute privacy, I should just give up? The same way I'd love to give up every last bit of dependence on Google, I'd love to get decentralized fintech. But the popular one is a bad word that starts with B and I fear has spoiled the well. (Though it's been interesting traveling through Europe and seeing Bitcoin signs all over Prague, the ticket machine offering bitcoin top up at the Bern train station, and a tradesman/construction worker wearing a Bitcoin advocacy shirt while walking to the beach in Bern today. And don't get me started on how much time I've spent triple-re-verifying my identity with Mastercard or waiting 5+ days for critical ACH transactions.)
colemickens commented on GitHub is down   githubstatus.com/?... · Posted by u/tomduncalf
black_puppydog · 6 years ago
how so? If everything is stored in IPSS, then it should always be online. The IPFS daemon is local, so you can commit things without any network connection. Am I misunderstanding what IPFS is?
colemickens · 6 years ago
"Currently the owner of the project must be online in order to receive any proposed RSM updates from a contributor. Once received and processed, these updates will be written to IPFS by the project owner, and made available to all users who follow that project." -- http://radicle.xyz/docs/#faq
colemickens commented on New York City to Consider Banning Sale of Cellphone Location Data   nytimes.com/2019/07/23/ny... · Posted by u/johnny313
sfkdjf9j3j · 6 years ago
It's wild how common this is, especially on Android, and how little people know about it. Those free apps you enjoy? Many of them make money by shipping with a 3rd party SDK that records your location (among other identifying information), collates it with other identifying information, and feeds it into the massive real time ad-tech system that powers large swaths of the internet.
colemickens · 6 years ago
Please understand I'm not excusing anything, it's horrendous it took this long to have user controls. That having been said, in the Android Q preview, Android occasionally lets me know that an app has access to my location at all times and makes it easy for me to immediately revoke that access, or limit it to ONLY when the application is open.

For example, this is what I can see by searching "Location" in settings and choosing one of the first results: https://i.imgur.com/jDF9vq6.png. It was shocking what this list looked like when I first upgraded to Q.

colemickens commented on GitHub is down   githubstatus.com/?... · Posted by u/tomduncalf
black_puppydog · 6 years ago
Nobody brought up radicle yet? HN what's up?

There you go: fully IPFS based version control and collaboration. https://radicle.xyz

colemickens · 6 years ago
I thought Radicle was cool too, but as I understand it (in its current state), it has a much "larger" SPOF in that changes can only be submitted when the single authoritative repo is online.

Deleted Comment

u/colemickens

KarmaCake day850November 12, 2014
About
lol, this place.
View Original