Readit News logoReadit News
brhsagain commented on Stop saying "just" (2019)   sgringwe.com/2019/10/10/P... · Posted by u/mooreds
brhsagain · a year ago
I agree that the word “just” carries that connotation but I disagree that it’s a bad thing. When I ask if we can just do something my intent is exactly to communicate that I think the thing is simple, that the details are unimportant (to me, to us) and that it ought to be easy to do (and if it’s not, that’s a problem in and of itself).

A lot of things are like this, and so to excise the word “just” would be to stop using a word that often concisely and accurately conveys what I’m trying to say.

It would be better if the article just said “this is rude.”

Deleted Comment

Deleted Comment

brhsagain commented on Solving the out-of-context chunk problem for RAG   d-star.ai/solving-the-out... · Posted by u/zmccormick7
brhsagain · 2 years ago
I've never seen so many epicycles in my life...

Deleted Comment

brhsagain commented on Why not just embed Neovim?   zed.dev/blog/zed-decoded-... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
brhsagain · 2 years ago
Back when I was building an IDE with a custom text editor, I initially used embedded Neovim thinking I would get the entire vim feature set out of the box for free. Unfortunately this became a never ending source of bugs. I think the fundamental problem was that my application was structured like a game with a main loop in a single thread, and Neovim turned text editing into an async operation, where I would have a separate thread reading events from Neovim and then trying to safely update the global buffer.

Also, I was constantly fighting/reverse engineering Neovim to get the granular level of control over behavior that I needed for a seamless integration. It’s just a type of programming that’s extremely frustrating and not fun.

In the end I implemented custom vim emulation from scratch and surprisingly it wasn’t that hard to get the “20% of features that people actually use 80% of the time,” except it’s more like 5% and 95%, and in exchange I could own the whole stack instead of depending on a third party black box. Never been happier to delete a whole subsystem of code in my life.

Deleted Comment

brhsagain commented on Instead of “auth”, we should say “permissions” and “login”   ntietz.com/blog/lets-say-... · Posted by u/tambourine_man
brhsagain · 2 years ago
I've always heard "auth" to mean authentication and "perms" to mean authorization.
brhsagain commented on The deskilling of web dev is harming us all   baldurbjarnason.com/2024/... · Posted by u/loop22
brhsagain · 2 years ago
I dunno. On the one hand I hate “web dev” more than anyone. I think it has led to such an astronomical decline in software quality that if you described it to someone from the days when computers were 1000x slower, they straight up wouldn’t believe you.

That said… the article doesn’t really ring true to me. What he is saying about the complexity of each part of the stack (http, html/dom, css) is technically true, but that’s not really how it washes out in practice. This whole “CSS is a complex graphics engine!” “HTTP is a protocol you could write a whole dissertation about!” sounds like an argument being made by someone trying to make a rhetorical point about web. In practice for most of web dev you don’t need to understand the deep nuances of CSS or HTTP or whatever. Yes, there is a large breadth of material you have to learn but the depth you actually need in any one area is much less than the author is trying to imply.

And yes, web is trash, but for different reasons. In fact some of those reasons are the opposite of what the author is saying. He says that each part of the stack is so complex it should be a separate specialty. But the real problem is the very fact that things are so complex. Rather than accept that complexity and subdivide the field into different disciplines, we should get rid of all this unneeded complexity to begin with.

brhsagain commented on Vietnamese property tycoon sentenced to death in $27B fraud case   theguardian.com/world/202... · Posted by u/spxneo
mrangle · 2 years ago
I'm not against the death penalty, in principle, but applying it risks both the moral and, slightly more more important, the judicial legitimacy of the system. Therefore, if it is to be considered and applied then moral care and sound judicial logic are paramount. Whatever the amount of stolen money, currency theft on its own it will never rise to the objective moral and logical base-level required to apply the death penalty. If the governments of developing nations want to be seen as other than basketcases, they need to be more judicious than this.
brhsagain · 2 years ago
Why are financial crimes morally exempt in a way that, say, violent crime is not, even if the aggregate damage from the financial crime is greater? Unless you’re arguing that this isn’t possible?

u/brhsagain

KarmaCake day817January 2, 2021View Original