I mean sure, it's impressive that they pulled it off - I wouldn't expect whoever decides these things to understand much about computer art subcultures, but I don't know what the benefit is, to anyone.
EDIT: I just realized that of course the answer is, like anything demosceners do, "because we can". What was I thinking?
Given how much of general purpose computation we lose every year to walled-gardens/prisons, I think it might help a wee bit now and then.
It is not really complicated but it does require discipline and commitment. Like some other commenters have suggested, a complicated system or a massive to-do isn't as reliable as a simple system which is easy to follow and gives you a quick overview of where things stand. In my experience, To-do systems don't help motivate - they help a bit to stay organised.
(Not as big as the one in Sweden though)
I have noticed too that "This Island Earth" (if you know this old classic sci-fi film) is another such script in which the protagonist could be removed with no change in the outcome.
It's a film trying to show the adventures of Indiana Jones.
The website says they're actually 38% polyamide and 2% elastane. I think they're 'wool mix' socks rather than wool socks.
EDIT: Also I see that the proportions differ based on the type of socks.
My other thought would be it seems like a bad "investment", as the older guy will most likely die before the young woman. But these days, single parenting is the norm rather than the exception. So is it really so much worse if the partner dies than if you divorce them and exclude them from your life? Yet again, single parenting is now almost being pushed as the model to aim for. And also "rainbow families" - if your partner dies, simply find a new one, it doesn't matter if they also already have kids. It is all possible and normal these days.
This is a rather unusual observation I have to say. How did you come to this conclusion, might I ask?