I was looking at ProtonMail. Now FastMail seems good too. So, wondering what is the best option between each.
Most teams we talk to still juggle data across Gmail, Slack, CRMs, Ads, spreadsheets, and custom internal systems. The dream is:
- Ask a natural-language question (“Which campaign gave us the best ROI last month?”) - Get the answer instantly, without waiting for a data team - And even take an action from the same place (“pause the underperforming ads,” “send a report to Slack”)
The obvious challenge: trust.
Would you let AI touch your production data or execute actions? Or should it remain read-only, with humans approving the final step?
We’ve built something in this space (hyperif.com), but I’m genuinely curious how you all see the balance between convenience and control.
- Where do you draw the line today? - What guardrails would you expect? - Is “analyze only” useful, or would “analyze + act” be the real unlock?
Would love to hear your perspectives.
On the other hand I know more incidents caused by overfunded corporate OSS developers who have taken over projects and justify their existence by manically rewriting the code base for no reason.
Many of these incidents are covered up. Contradicting the corporate politicians is dangerous, because often they have installed dozens of other developers who always agree with them and are ready to libel dissenters.
OSS funding is a hard problem. OSS was best when it wasn't funded at all.
“Best” is subjective yet I don’t disagree. But what you don’t mention, which I think is important to mention here, is the proliferation of OSS that other vital, closed source software (often monetized) depends upon. OSS has always powered vital software, I’m just making the point that it’s increasingly, alarmingly common.
“Alarming” because the OSS developers often feel they should be compensated if their work is monetized and/or powers other vital software. There is a license for this, but it’s difficulty and complicated to enforce. And it’s not surprising for someone to license their work as “do whatever you want with it” at first, only to change their mind later when they see it used in FAANG products. But then it’s too late, and bitterness and anger creep in.
Take the anger and bitterness of a generation+ of OSS developers and you have our current predicament :(
Some real numbers on this would be nice to have too. If you've seen any research in this area please share.
Do you have any sources for this? It doesn’t seem right to make a vague statement (a large chunk) which sounds bad, nor a somewhat less vague conjecture (maybe the majority?) without sources.
In my very limited experience, any developer who is significantly supporting OSS with code contributions is a high contributor for their employer, and if they don’t always do the agreed-upon number of hours/week for their employer, I doubt it’s far off. So I disagree with you anecdotally, which doesn’t matter much, and I question your sources, which matters more.
I just want a wearable that allows me to communicate with people, and get basic info from the web like weather. And that has better battery life. Here’s hoping…