The US economy is the world leader and continues to pull ahead of everyone else.
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2023/04/13/the-lessons-fro...
The US economy is the world leader and continues to pull ahead of everyone else.
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2023/04/13/the-lessons-fro...
When I lived there you would be able to get a gyudon for roughly 300-400 yens
It will get you full but it’s not very nutritive
You can eat many eastern / western fast food dishes for around that price, but if you want to go to an actual sit down restaurant it’s much more expensive
I didn’t cook in Tokyo because I was on a scholarship so I didn’t care, but friends told me it would be cheaper to cook too
I can get the same dish in Canada for 8 AUD and can cook for less than half the money, and Canada is not a cheap country
I didn't say anything with the intent to be impressive. I'm describing differences between dense urban and suburban pros & cons. Neither is objectively better, they are different.
> No transit doesn’t need to be in the same route, there are bus terminals and metro line connections
Sure. So now you need to spend a lot of time traveling in the wrong direction just to get to a central terminal and then take another bus to the intended direction. It's all tradeoffs.
You are not describing differences between urban & suburban
Maybe you are for America specifically but most of what you described is normal in urban areas of Japan or Germany for instance
As long as you only ever want to see people who also live in the same transit route.
I have some friends that moved to an apartment in San Francisco, it is nearly impossible to visit them since there is no parking anywhere nearby.
> Low density means you are unlikely to live a walkable distance from a friend, so suburbia sucks for that too
This morning my elementary school age kid walked to a friends house in a different neighborhood (10 min walk). As I'm typing this, one of his school friends just walked over from his house (3 min walk) to play. Being able to walk (particularly the kids) to friends is one of the prime reasons people like the suburbs.
> Honestly the only thing you said that is true is the big yard
And the road biking, mountain biking, playgrounds, sport fields and so on.
> everything else is worse in suburbia than cities
Clearly a matter of activity preferences, so it is not an objective truth to say one or the other is worse. Dense cities are great for bars, clubs, museums, that kind of thing. Suburbs are great for outdoor activities, sports, hobbies that needs space (e.g. woodworking, try that in an apartment), walking to friends, forests, etc.
No transit doesn’t need to be in the same route, there are bus terminals and metro line connections
Not by everyone.
Suburbia is bad for bar crawls, but after my 20s that wasn't a priority. Suburbia is great for access to mountain biking, road biking, playgrounds for the kids, sports fields, walking to friends houses, having space for a yard and BBQs, having friends over (plenty of parking) and countless other activities. It's really pretty awesome.
Low density means you are unlikely to live a walkable distance from a friend, so suburbia sucks for that too
Honestly the only thing you said that is true is the big yard, everything else is worse in suburbia than cities
Maybe not American cities, but most suck anyway
Also the article was discussing "greatest economy ever for the USA".
I don’t know about other South American countries.
I wouldn’t call Portugal an European power, they never had a significant population. Same for Switzerland.
Spain was completely destroyed just before world war 2 during a civil war
Most of Asia and Africa had been put under European control before world war 2, which actually was one of the reasons there was war: Germans had almost no colonies and wanted to expand
Turkey had lost world war 1 a few years back (Ottoman Empire)