These products are for the many millions of people who prefer an inexpensive alternative to meat.
These products are for the many millions of people who prefer an inexpensive alternative to meat.
https://thecountersignal.com/uk-school-children-to-be-fed-bu...
Fake meat made of hyper-processed plant materials are NOT meat and who knows what long term health effects would result from someone subsisting solely on that kind of food.
Human beings evolved to eat whole plants and meat. We generally find eating insects repulsive for a reason, just as we don't generally like hearing the sound of someone vomiting because it means illness is nearby. In my case I am listening to my gut and I will resist all efforts to get me to eat crickets for my protein while driving up the cost of beef so high it can only be afforded by the rich.
A free man with any dignity does not prefer crickets over meat or pretend fungus is bacon.
All heavily marketed "trends" are predetermined to forward an ultimate agenda from the permanent elite class. Bill Gates doesn't want you eating beef and pork. He wants you eating his fake "meat" so they can shut down the livestock industry to save Mother Gaia from global warming.
The AMA recommends against red meat because it's high in saturated fats. It's never been proven that saturated fats are the cause of atherosclerosis.
Is this a conspiracy? Yes. But it's not a theory, the evidence is all around.
How will they do this, exactly?
Also, isn't the cost of real meat too low as it is? It hasn't priced in climate externalities that other people (including non-meat-eaters) have to pay for. Shouldn't meat include all of its costs, not just the ones paid by the farmers?
Easy. Heavily regulate the farmers with climate regulations including carbon taxes. Or pass emissions laws like they have in the Netherlands which would force ranchers to downsize their herds. This would drive up cost to produce and scarcity of the product.
As for the second part of your comment I truly am not sure what you're talking about? It seems like your sentiment confirms the first part of my answer.