Readit NewsThis has been procedure for the last 40 years.
There is no excuse that is feasable or plausible for 'forgetting' important medications in the checked baggage.
This is a reading comprehension problem and not an airline issue.
This is where my "Probably written by AI" filter tripped, and I skipped to the end.
I can't exactly say why. Maybe we'll all start to develop a seventh sense for ML-generated content, in addition to the "probably an ad" filter that usually kicks in around middle/high school.
OpenAI commented on the verboseness of answers as something they need to work on.
But what ongoing value do I get for my subscription? Will I get free acceleration upgrades over time because they keep improving the software? Free brake light DLCs that show how hard I’m accelerating? It’s great I can upgrade OTA but what about that means I need to pay over and over?
Acceleration is not a service- there’s no ongoing cost to deliver it to owners and there’s no increase in value to the owner over time to compensate for the ever increasing cost. That’s why I think the subscription model is much more exploitative.
I don’t get the “it’s not a service” argument. It’s not relevant. There’s no ongoing cost with many software licenses either. It’s just a business model.
The mutability is the part that bothers me. Remotely disabling features and the option to hike prices for monthly subscriptions to have functionality in the car serve to erode the concept of ownership. I'm not a Tesla owner but I believe they also allow paid upgrades that neither stick with the owner nor with the car during a sale. How is that not exploitative?
For my personal case, it still doesn’t matter, of course.
It’s not a subscription, but the idea is the same.
It doesn’t bother me one bit: I bought the car knowing full well that it wasn’t included, I don’t need it (the standard acceleration is already more than I ever had before), end of story.
Car engines have been under the control of software for decades now, with different products differing by the program. The only difference here is that there’s now the option to change the program over the air.
Nobody would have complained if Mercedes had offered 2 versions without the option to upgrade.
It's kind of tragic the amount of engineering talent wasted on non-problems at social media websites.
Lars shoots a different style, which is basically "draw and loose" with very little "aiming". The aiming done in that situation is to basically "look at what you want to hit".
Here's a Smarter Every Day episode that shows some of that. You see Byron Ferguson there already putting the arrow on but there's no aiming. When the mint is thrown in the air, he just looks at the mint and instinctively aims and shoots it in mid air.
https://youtu.be/Q8Yp9SjCU5E?t=225
I recommend the whole episode.
Also Legendary Howard Hill: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36R7cLzPNuw
It's amazing how well this works if you don't need to hit a mint and no worries of shooting a person and even without exactly spined arrows and with just a stick and a string for a bow. Source: I do this for fun (with larger targets).
Even the numbers of PCIe bandwidth test might not change much, even it's trying to test medium size memory to memory block transfers.
Some serious credible citations needed for that apparent hogwash.
It is also true that COVID can weaken your general immune system.
But that doesn’t mean that getting COVID won’t increase your immunity against a future COVID infection, temporarily at least, just the way the effectiveness of the vaccine is temporary.