Readit News logoReadit News
SZJX commented on Jimmy Lai Is a Martyr for Freedom   reason.com/2025/12/19/jim... · Posted by u/mooreds
SZJX · 3 days ago
> It demands people ask: Do you prefer Hong Kong's past? Or its future?

Such a formulation is either sheer ignorance or worse, full-on deliberate cynicism.

Hong Kong's "past" was a typical colony where the governor was appointed by the British government with no local input whatsoever, and where any assembly of more than 6 people was deemed illegal and brutally suppressed. The type of thing that people like Gandhi (who are apparently heroes in contemporary narratives) fought against throughout their lives.

The British government only started changing the laws and handing locals more political freedom and freedom of speech once they knew that Hong Kong was returning to China no matter what (surprise, surprise).

In all such propaganda you see now, they try to construct a "past" that never existed, and apparently a lot of the young generation who never experienced the old days fell for it. But the older generation would tell them outright that "Hong Kong's past" is far less rosy than what's made out to be.

It's just astonishing when you see the amount of people waving British and American flags on the streets during the protests. What kind of "fight for freedom and independence" is that? Just imagine the reaction to protesters in a US territory or a European region (Catalonia etc.) waving Russian or Chinese flags.

SZJX commented on New nanotherapy clears amyloid-β, reversing symptoms of Alzheimer's in mice   drugtargetreview.com/news... · Posted by u/self_awareness
matthewdgreen · 3 months ago
There’s been a long-running Internet movement to cast the beta-amyloid and beta-amyloid/tau hypotheses as an evil plot by scientists to siphon money away from research that works. It’s a whole thing. I anssume it’s because Alzheimer’s legitimately sucks (my mom has it) and that means there has to be someone we can blame.
SZJX · 3 months ago
Not sure it’s a “long-running Internet movement”. You make it sound like one of those loony anti-science conspiracist agendas. There have been a lot of serious articles written about it. I don’t think it’s hard to believe that a lot of scientists and institutions have the incentive to try to keep a whole system of focusing on removing beta-amyloid going as a self-fulfilling cycle. Getting funding and publication citations snd promotions etc. could always be the fundamental incentive out there.
SZJX commented on New nanotherapy clears amyloid-β, reversing symptoms of Alzheimer's in mice   drugtargetreview.com/news... · Posted by u/self_awareness
MrDrMcCoy · 3 months ago
Probably this one: https://brainenergy.com/

I've read it, it's quite good and full of citations. I've seen a number of studies since it came out that support it as well.

If you like that, also check out "This is Your Brain on Food" which overlaps with much of the content there, but with a bit more of a focus on the gut brain connection.

SZJX · 3 months ago
Change Your Diet, Change Your Mind is another book on these topics which is rather comprehensive and compelling.
SZJX commented on The Buchstabenmuseum Berlin is closing   buchstabenmuseum.de/en/... · Posted by u/t-vi
SZJX · 3 months ago
Good that I saw this post on its last day of opening. Gonna pay a visit today. Typography is fascinating. Thanks for sharing.
SZJX commented on People instantly decide whether to trust a product based on design   andrewcoyle.com/blog/beau... · Posted by u/coyleandrew
SZJX · 6 months ago
It's mindblowing how the majority of the comments here seem to be rather cynical and distrustful. I'd be really discouraged if I were the author. I (as an engineer) found the article rather well-written and convincing! Well, at least it did get 100+ upvotes.
SZJX commented on People instantly decide whether to trust a product based on design   andrewcoyle.com/blog/beau... · Posted by u/coyleandrew
meelford · 6 months ago
It’s the same with articles: I tend to prefer those from scientific magazines, where decoration is minimal and the authors focus on conveying meaning, rather than those that are perfectly designed on Medium or LinkedIn but, in reality, are very shallow and often outdated. Most deliberately decorated products also look over-processed.
SZJX · 6 months ago
That's the whole point of the article: It's not about "decoration", but about making the underlying UX flow make coherent sense.
SZJX commented on People instantly decide whether to trust a product based on design   andrewcoyle.com/blog/beau... · Posted by u/coyleandrew
karmakaze · 6 months ago
> “If they couldn’t be bothered to align the text, what else did they overlook?” But a clean, coherent layout creates harmony. It shows someone cared. And that care is contagious. It makes the user care too.

It may only show that they cared enough to fool you into thinking the product is good. Good design can be hijacked to be a fake proxy for a good product. It's basically fruits and vegetables that look good to sell and taste bland.

SZJX · 6 months ago
That's a similar thing to clothing though. You may argue how it can be manipulated all you want, but people do think in this way and it's a socially agreed upon contract to show you care enough about the occasion and have enough respect for the other people present. No head of state shows up to a meeting in shorts and slippers for a reason.
SZJX commented on People instantly decide whether to trust a product based on design   andrewcoyle.com/blog/beau... · Posted by u/coyleandrew
mrob · 6 months ago
I trust software more if it's ugly. Desktop software interfaces were pretty much solved by the late 90s. The majority of changes since then have been aimed at either dumbing down the software to better appeal to people who are easily manipulated and exploited, or just change for the sake of change so designers can justify their jobs. And I choose to avoid mobile devices because every one of them is slow and frustrating compared to using a keyboard and mouse.

I believe modern UI designers provide me negative value on average. Ugly software is a good sign because tells me no designer was there to ruin it.

SZJX · 6 months ago
That doesn't seem to be talking about exactly the same point as the article is focusing on though.
SZJX commented on Harper – an open-source alternative to Grammarly   writewithharper.com... · Posted by u/ReadCarlBarks
SZJX · 6 months ago
I was wondering about grammar checking tools in the era of LLMs, especially for grammar checks beyond English, and Sapling https://sapling.ai seemed decent. Nobody seems to have mentioned it here?
SZJX commented on Business books are entertainment, not strategic tools   theorthagonist.substack.c... · Posted by u/ZeroTalent
SZJX · 8 months ago
You can always come up with criticism for anything. Do they deliver some interesting ideas (while understandably they might oversimplify some other aspects) and are not complete frauds? If so there is some value in them.

u/SZJX

KarmaCake day730July 4, 2015View Original