Readit News logoReadit News
MuteXR commented on Using JWT to establish a trusted context for Row Level Security   vondra.me/posts/using-jwt... · Posted by u/JeanSebTr
twosdai · 4 days ago
> You should really consider not using JWT for new designs that don't a priori need to interop with JWT.

If you're trying to make the argument that because they can be insecure, we should not use JWTs. Thats not really a great argument for most people. JWTs provide a lot of value, and the idea of having some secure, validatable, and no network required check for authentication, or transporting information. Is too valuable for businesses. So we all use JWTs, they are a decent standard.

At the very least you should propose an alternative that people use besides JWTs if you're going to vaugly hand wave about the scary security issues of 2021 firebase, and 2020 Npm packages reported by Auth0.

MuteXR · 4 days ago
The JWT standard is known to be full of nonsense. Acting like this is some non-issue is hilariously disconnected from reality.
MuteXR commented on Open models by OpenAI   openai.com/open-models/... · Posted by u/lackoftactics
Invictus0 · a month ago
What is the point of an offline reasoning model that also doesn't know anything and makes up facts? Why would anyone prefer this to a frontier model?
MuteXR · a month ago
Data processing? Reasoning on supplied data?
MuteXR commented on How to gain code execution on hundreds of millions of people and popular apps   kibty.town/blog/todesktop... · Posted by u/xyzeva
cdmyrm · 6 months ago
How confident are you that their log system is resilient, given the state of the rest of their software?
MuteXR · 6 months ago
Following that logic it would be literally impossible to trust any part of their infra. They had a bad build container, the rest of their stuff was solid.
MuteXR commented on Security Issues in Matrix's Olm Library   soatok.blog/2024/08/14/se... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
Arathorn · a year ago
the author literally picked random projects from github tagged as matrix, without considering their prevalence or whether they are actually maintained etc.

if you actually look at % of impacted clients, it’s tiny.

meanwhile, it is very unclear that any sidechannel attack on a libolm based client is practical over the network (which is why we didn’t fix this years ago). After all, the limited primitives are commented on in the readme and https://github.com/matrix-org/olm/issues/3 since day 1.

MuteXR · a year ago
You SHIPPED CODE THAT YOU KNEW HAD A SIDE CHANNEL????? WHAT?
MuteXR commented on Privacy focused platform Skiff is joining Notion, Skiff to be sunset   notion.so/blog/meet-skiff... · Posted by u/mirshko
dig1 · 2 years ago
Running mail isn't hard if you know a few bits about how things work. As a matter of fact, if correctly set, it can be left running for years without significant time investment. But I'm getting the impression that anything that can't be set in 2 clicks is hard for a particular HN crowd.
MuteXR · 2 years ago
Your tiny Postfix server is nothing compared to what large scale mail hosting entails.
MuteXR commented on Don't Fire People for Making Pornography in Their Free Time   theatlantic.com/ideas/arc... · Posted by u/fortran77
hackernoteng · 2 years ago
I believe in objective morality. Porn is immoral. A persons immoral behavior outside of work is a red flag. It means they are also MORE likely to ack immoral at work. Based on that, it could be grounds for dismissal.
MuteXR · 2 years ago
Objective morality is how a child sees the world. Not moving on from that is embarrassing.
MuteXR commented on Drew DeVault bullies creator of Hyprland, publishes private chat logs   fosstodon.org/@drewdevaul... · Posted by u/penshan
MuteXR · 2 years ago
why does any of this even matter?
MuteXR commented on Migrating our backend from Vercel to Fly.io   openstatus.dev/blog/migra... · Posted by u/Hooopo
teddyh · 2 years ago
Some people avoid large providers, since large providers have approximately no incentive whatsoever to keep you, specifically, as a customer. I.e. large providers will happily raise their prices, alter the deal, throw you under the bus, disable your account, delete all you data and then refuse to talk to you. They can do this because, when they look at the big picture, you don’t matter to them. And since doing this saves them some money, they all do it.
MuteXR · 2 years ago
And a small service can go under anytime, without any real warning.

Most big providers end up being cheaper for you as well. Vercel is insanely expensive.

MuteXR commented on Possible 0day in Signal? Disable link preview   hax0rbana.social/@adam/11... · Posted by u/jwildeboer
MuteXR · 2 years ago
There is literally no info there except rumors which OP doesn't even specify the source of.
MuteXR commented on Shitoberfest: Free T-shirts ruined Hacktoberfest2020   ongchinhwee.me/shitoberfe... · Posted by u/marcodiego
MuteXR · 2 years ago
Feels like an odd thing to post now. It's almost been three years. Hacktoberfest has been opt-in ever since, and is clearly doing fine when it comes to participants. They ran out of shirts completely last time.

u/MuteXR

KarmaCake day33December 4, 2022View Original