At this point I've kind of accepted the project is dead but my manager is gone. I've put together a few small PRs but they're similarly just in review hell.
At this point I've kind of accepted the project is dead but my manager is gone. I've put together a few small PRs but they're similarly just in review hell.
Do you don't work in a Team?
Or aren't you building up a team or org?
Either it's your position to see issues and solve them for the org or it's your job to execute.
If you can't come up with things to do, but it's your job, you should search for a team or product and not for a company.
Or how does a researcher uses those manuals for requesting time?
Or are all request/approvals going through a core tech team?
Or we continue to do that ev transition thing but continue to do it with everyone were it is a no brainer first and on the way we solve all the upcoming problems?
1. The UK has to bring in solar power from other countries to meet emissions targets or have more Nuclear capacity. 2. Reduction in energy consumption is just as important as energy sources. This involves use of more efficient technologies, primarly through electrification.
These factors highlight that abundant renewable energy is actually not abundant enough in reality and is unlikely to be for a country like the UK, even with efficiency gains from massive electrification. Without nuclear investment, renewable energy needs to be imported which has infrastructure and geoplitical considerations, as well as being a single point of failure.
[1] http://www.withouthotair.com/ (synopsis at http://www.withouthotair.com/synopsis10.pdf)
If people/countries would have prioritized this kind of stuff, there would be a few more DC cables around the globe.
It is an easy fix to have renewable energy across the globe.
At least in Germany most new build building have solar panels on the roof.
Apple's star on the other hand is rising. The M1 is simply amazing. The article states this guy headed up the transition from Intel to M1. If so, he did an amazing job. Prior to the initial M1 release, I thought there'd be an annoying if not painful transition with lots of issues. To the contrary, it was smooth and a monumental success by any measure.
So Apple would be paying through the nose to keep this guy. Intel, being in shambles, would have to pay bank to lure him away. I'd honestly expect his compensation at Intel to easily be $10m+ per year. Easily. Good for him. I really hope Intel recovers. Competition is good.
> Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger in October said that he hopes to win back Apple's business in the future by creating "a better chip" than Apple can make.
I don't know what to make of this statement. Apple wants to control every aspect of the product. They don't want to be dependent on Intel for chips. They initially moved to Intel because Intel at that stage was the clear leader and PowerPC just couldn't compete. Now Apple has its own silicon it's never giving that up so it's so strange for him to say this.
EDIT: Corrected POWER to PowerPC.
What's the befit if fertilizer helps?
That it looks more natural?
You also need to assume that there are potentially control pictures in it as well.
I think this is a very liable approach.
There is a reason macbooks, still the gold standard for hi dpi rendering, have never had 4k panels.
There have been plenty of counter examples.
Anyway, my smartphone has 1000x2000 resolution on a 6" display. The text looks perfect.
They can make very high resolution displays with very efficient energy consumption.
Feel free not to need it but my DSLR and my smartphone both take 4k and higher resolution pictures for years.
Yes I want such a display on my 14" laptop.
I do like the MacBook pro screen and it's much better than 1080p. True.
2. I think you use this tool to submit proposals: https://jwst-docs.stsci.edu/jwst-astronomers-proposal-tool-o...
3. They go through a panel to be peer-reviewed and compared to other proposals (similar to how grants are allocated by the government). I'm fairly certain this process also includes review by instrumentation experts. The process is double-blind and the first cycle has already been allocated: https://www.stsci.edu/jwst/science-execution/approved-progra....
Like if exposer time etc. Is correct.