I suppose my main criticism was about the "later" features. It comes off as dishonest to mention features that may be implemented at some point in the future on a page meant to inform potential customers about what they would be paying for _today_. So I would suggest to only promote fully-working features, and leave future features for a roadmap page linked elsewhere.
Other than that I would say that there are a lot of asterisks and clarifications that might confuse users. The page looks overloaded with information that is not well structured IMO. It's also mentioned that a credit card is not needed for the trial, but then you will email users about how to pay. Maybe this should be clarified on this page? And there are minor visual details like inconsistent font sizes, font weights, and parenthesis usage (e.g. why is "Idle blogs" between bold parenthesis?).
It seems that you're not a native English speaker, and that's fine (neither am I), but I would suggest hiring someone who is, and has experience in writing technical documentation to revise your entire site, so that it can have a more professional appearance. These days LLMs can also be helpful with this, as long as you set their tone and review their output.
Good luck!
Thanks, good to know. (Will fix)
> a lot of asterisks and clarifications that might confuse users
Yes! People email and ask about the pricing more often than I thought.
> It's also mentioned that a credit card is not needed for the trial, but then you will email users about how to pay. Maybe this should be clarified on this page?
Hmm. Yes, there could be something about "if you want to continue after the free trial".
> It seems that you're not a native English speaker
That's right
> but I would suggest hiring someone who is, and has experience in writing technical documentation to revise your entire site, so that it can have a more professional appearance. These days LLMs can also be helpful with this
Ok :- ) First, all the LLMs, then a human I guess.
Thanks for all the ideas. Sorry for the late (8 days) reply.
Just started reading The E-Myth Revisited, hopefully that, plus the sleepiness problem being mostly gone, can put things in better order.
Thanks, good to know. (Will fix)
> a lot of asterisks and clarifications that might confuse users
Yes! People email and ask about the pricing more often than I thought.
> It's also mentioned that a credit card is not needed for the trial, but then you will email users about how to pay. Maybe this should be clarified on this page?
Hmm. Yes, there could be something about "if you want to continue after the free trial".
> It seems that you're not a native English speaker
That's right
> but I would suggest hiring someone who is, and has experience in writing technical documentation to revise your entire site, so that it can have a more professional appearance. These days LLMs can also be helpful with this
Ok :- ) First, all the LLMs, then a human I guess.
Thanks for all the ideas. Sorry for the late (8 days) reply.
Just started reading The E-Myth Revisited, hopefully that, plus the sleepiness problem being mostly gone, can put things in better order.
> Though I would suggest a general revision of the copy on this page, and removing all the "later" features.
Now done — all "Later: ..." features are gone, and I did a general revision of the copy on the pricing pages, based on what you wrote, and based on Gemini's and ChatGPT's feedback (when I copy-pasted the HTML into the AI chats — they had many pages feedback).
> These days LLMs can also be helpful with this
They were amazingly helpful. Thanks for suggesting! I'll ask them to review the whole website, like you suggested, some time later too.