Readit News logoReadit News
Infinitesimus commented on Study finds memory decline surge in young people   onepercentrule.substack.c... · Posted by u/drcwpl
binary132 · 4 months ago
I don’t think I quite caught your meaning.
Infinitesimus · 4 months ago
I mean this turn of speech makes it easier to identify hunan (carbon) or machine (silicon) content.

Took me a bit to figure it out too

Infinitesimus commented on When the Dotcom Bubble Burst   dfarq.homeip.net/when-the... · Posted by u/rbanffy
eastdakota · a year ago
Those 8 years were painful. To make money, I worked as a bartender, an LSAT test prep instructor, as an adjunct law professor at a law school that was so bad it doesn’t exist anymore. I remember 4am at the bar in Chicago where I worked, cleaning up some patron’s puke off the floor, and thinking: I need to figure something else out.

All the time I was trying to find an idea for a startup. I still had the lawyer bit flipped on so lots of things I tried had a legal/regulatory bent. That was definitely a blind spot that held me back for a while.

The fun YC-related story on the founding of Cloudflare is that, before YC, Paul Graham used to host a conference called the “MIT Anti-Spam Conference.” He invited me the second year of the conference (2003, I think) to give a talk on how to write effective anti-spam laws. The very technical crowd was polite to the lawyer. I met a ton of interesting people, many of whom played outsized roles in machine learning over the next few years, including John Graham-Cumming, now Cloudflare’s CTO. Paul invited me back the following year saying I should do something similar.

I was pretty sure the audience wouldn’t tolerate the lawyer giving another talk about regulation, so I went to a young engineer on the team of the (bad) startup I was working on and suggested we build a system to track how spammers scrape your email addresses. He agreed to build the backend if I built the front end (which I largely stole from the hot startup of the time: LinkedIn). That turned into Project Honey Pot, which I gave a talk on at Paul’s conference. Project Honey Pot gave the initial seed of an idea that turned into Cloudflare. And the young engineer was Lee Holloway who cofounded Cloudflare with me and Michelle Zatlyn.

Lesson to me has always been even in times where you don’t feel like you’re making forward progress in your life and career, find ways to stay involved with interesting people and projects and chances are they’ll pay dividends in ways you don’t expect later in life.

I clearly remember walking back to Paul’s house in Cambridge after the 2004 conference where I’d presented Project Honey Pot. I believe he and Jessica had relatively recently started dating. They were talking about startups and how people didn’t understand how they worked. Paul suggested they should teach a class at MIT. And that, of course, is what later turned into YC.

There were other dramatic events that evening in Cambridge that I think sharpened all our minds and made us appreciate there’s no time like the present, but I’ll leave that story for another day.

Infinitesimus · a year ago
Damn, what a turn of opportunities from just saying yes and showing up (and obviously a ton of hardwork and sacrifices). Thanks for sharing!

I can't resist ...

> There were other dramatic events that evening in Cambridge that I think sharpened all our minds and made us appreciate there’s no time like the present, but I’ll leave that story for another day.

> ... appreciate there’s no time like the present ...

The present is now! Some of us are dying to hear the story.

Infinitesimus commented on A Short Introduction to Automotive Lidar Technology   viksnewsletter.com/p/shor... · Posted by u/kayson
jaimex2 · a year ago
Yeah, it only works in extremely controlled environments driving really slowly.

The design is also flawed as it has to work with cameras anyway. The last thing you want is two systems arguing over what they see.

Infinitesimus · a year ago
It doesn't have to be an argument. You know what each system is good at and prioritize inputs accordingly.
Infinitesimus commented on Mid-level Nvidia employee gets $62M in stock options; another lost it all   tomshardware.com/pc-compo... · Posted by u/Stratoscope
brutus1213 · 2 years ago
I have to say honestly, the whole episode with NVidia's recent rise has left me quite demotivated about capitalism and the value of hard work. NVidia used to be a second tier job from the perspective of software professionals. The folks that worked there worked hard but it was not harder than any other top or mid-tier software company. That these folks hit the jackpot is great for them but quite senseless from the perspective of "you get rewarded for your efforts" perspective.

AI has been known to work and be important for many years. The reason NVidia is in the position it is, is more due to the work of OpenAI, which of course builds on the entire community's effort.

I'm trying to rationalize so this is a genuine feeling and perhaps a question. How does one rationalize such wind-falls. I know about lottery tickets but the number of people that got a payoff on this one is vast. And yes, I'll admit I'm jealous.

Infinitesimus · 2 years ago
1. Life isn't fair. The earlier you accept that, the better off you'll be. This unfairness is why you're here posting on hackernews and someone through no fault of theirs is starving trying to cross the Sahara into greener pastures. It cuts both ways.

2. Hard work rarely ever implies financial success.

3. "...second tier job from the perspective of software professionals". Tiers are a made up concept. An Nvidia programmer working on critical HPC work is in a difference league than someone who is very good at making infinite scroll smooth.

Software is a broad field with different specializations. I don't know what you do but you made a bet and it's probably turned out quite well for you. Other people's bets did worse, others did better.

Comparison is the thief of joy. Remember to be grateful for where you are and how far you've come.

Infinitesimus commented on From engineer to manager: what I love, what I hate   thoughtspile.github.io/20... · Posted by u/signa11
fabianholzer · 2 years ago
> The fact that you have to stack rank and pick an under-performer every half is just broken.

I've sworn to myself, that the moment that this idiotic idea get introduced in the "performance management" process at the place I work, will be the day that I'll start to send out resumes. Even if it were handled lottery style ("the short straw") I would not cut slack to either manager or company for such an indignity.

Infinitesimus · 2 years ago
It mostly masquerades as performance curves.

You're not being told to pick someone, you're being told that your org cannot really have 80% of people meeting/exceeding expectations and that because reasons (budget), you should review the cusp cases and adjust them down.

Infinitesimus commented on Rebuilding Netflix's video processing pipeline with microservices   netflixtechblog.com/rebui... · Posted by u/samaysharma
Infinitesimus · 2 years ago
Ridiculed by whom? We've seen many competitors try to make a streaming service and beyond Apple, they all provide a laggy experience even in the menus.

If you're going to emulate someone, it's not a bad idea to emulate who has the best results

Infinitesimus commented on OpenAI scrapped a promise to disclose key documents to the public   wired.com/story/openai-sc... · Posted by u/nickthegreek
jefftk · 2 years ago
They are still legally owned by a non-profit.

https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/810...

Infinitesimus · 2 years ago
I think we all saw how that went when the non-profit board assumed they had any credible power.
Infinitesimus commented on Why new hires often get paid more than existing employees   bloomberry.com/why-new-hi... · Posted by u/altdataseller
tmsh · 2 years ago
A 10x engineer does not stay in the same role/level as a company grows. They’re very important though. And it’s a good reminder that roles/levels don’t necessarily matter compared to the relevant work.

All FAANG and other smart companies hire at better than 50% at the role/level in order to constantly evolve.

Infinitesimus · 2 years ago
No they don't. They _say_ they do (really mainly Amazon) and the rumor develops legs and gets repeated.

To actually do this, you need an objective measure that is repeatable over many different kinds of products, domains and people and they is a very hard problem no one has cracked. Career ladders and some calibrations help to do this but it'd never perfect and people slip through the cracks.

If you're at a big company, you've seen people get a rating that seemed misaligned to their work because an arbitrary curve is enforced or a project has high visibility by sheet luck because an exec was adamant that the project be on the roadmap.

Infinitesimus commented on Netflix never used its $1M algorithm (2012)   thenextweb.com/news/remem... · Posted by u/reqo
gverrilla · 2 years ago
Netflix feels like Blockbuster did some years ago.
Infinitesimus · 2 years ago
How so?
Infinitesimus commented on IT employment grew by just 700 jobs in 2023   wsj.com/articles/it-emplo... · Posted by u/maheshs
Nimitz14 · 2 years ago
I work at FAANG. People here coast while making mountains of money.
Infinitesimus · 2 years ago
Google is the big tech company with that reputation though. MS has pockets but pays considerably worse

u/Infinitesimus

KarmaCake day1380March 4, 2014
About
Human who loves solving problems. Sometimes with code.

Feel free to email me if you ever want to hang out in the Boston area or talk futurism, philosophy and technology.

View Original