Readit News logoReadit News
Gtex555 commented on Pro bettors disguising themselves as gambling addicts   bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/JumpCrisscross
HDThoreaun · a year ago
Most gamblers are casuals. I spend $5-10 a week during football and usually am down like $10 at the end of the year. It provides a lot of entertainment, sucks that some people can’t control themselves but I shouldn’t be punished for that.

Agree that heavily regulating and perhaps banning advertising needs to be done.

Gtex555 · a year ago
the government's goal should be to protect the population not to be fair to one person who enjoys the odd $5 bet.
Gtex555 commented on Tell HN: YouTube disabling playback after 3 videos    · Posted by u/squigz
Supermancho · 2 years ago
install brave, disable other adblockers for youtube. works for me
Gtex555 · 2 years ago
Brave breaks too many websites.
Gtex555 commented on Tell HN: YouTube disabling playback after 3 videos    · Posted by u/squigz
Gtex555 · 2 years ago
What you don't realize is YouTube would rather have half the users if all of them watched ads vs AdBlock users, so they actually want you to stop using YouTube. Most people will just white list it, I mean the bulk of users use mobile anyway and cant really use AdBlock.
Gtex555 commented on Ask HN: Why is it assumed to be harder to bootstrap a Reddit-type site today?    · Posted by u/mustafa_pasi
mikequinlan · 2 years ago
It is very hard to start a new subreddit. You have to somehow initially get enough people to join and participate to create enough posts and conversations to get other people interested in joining.
Gtex555 · 2 years ago
chicken and the egg problem
Gtex555 commented on Goodreads was the future of book reviews, then Amazon bought it   washingtonpost.com/techno... · Posted by u/pseudolus
fastball · 2 years ago
Eh, Goodreads has always suffered from the same problem that plagues every other review system which uses "score out of X" ranking.

Humans just aren't very good at ranking things on a normal distribution, so you invariably end up with every item (books in this case) being ranked somewhere in the 3.5-4.5 range (since Goodreads is out of 5). For IMDB the rankings all hover around 8ish. When in reality the average book should have a 2.5. If you don't rate like this then you just end up with garbage.

Just allowing a boolean rating (ala Rotten Tomatoes when aggregated) is much better, assuming you can get enough reviews for that system to actually work (probably > 30 is required for most applications).

I think "aggregated personal Elo" would be a fun way to rank things: I just give you two books that you've read and you tell me which is better. Do this loads of times and eventually you have a solid ranking of every book you've ever read. Aggregate everyone's rankings and you have a much more robust system then "please rate this book out of 5 stars".

Gtex555 · 2 years ago
Couldn't you do this implicitly if I rate book A an 8 and book B a 7 then I have technically said book A is better than book B, so ignore the numerical value and take the better reading. Now put the rating out of 100 as out of 5 or 10 would lead to too many ties.
Gtex555 commented on Goodreads was the future of book reviews, then Amazon bought it   washingtonpost.com/techno... · Posted by u/pseudolus
fastball · 2 years ago
Eh, Goodreads has always suffered from the same problem that plagues every other review system which uses "score out of X" ranking.

Humans just aren't very good at ranking things on a normal distribution, so you invariably end up with every item (books in this case) being ranked somewhere in the 3.5-4.5 range (since Goodreads is out of 5). For IMDB the rankings all hover around 8ish. When in reality the average book should have a 2.5. If you don't rate like this then you just end up with garbage.

Just allowing a boolean rating (ala Rotten Tomatoes when aggregated) is much better, assuming you can get enough reviews for that system to actually work (probably > 30 is required for most applications).

I think "aggregated personal Elo" would be a fun way to rank things: I just give you two books that you've read and you tell me which is better. Do this loads of times and eventually you have a solid ranking of every book you've ever read. Aggregate everyone's rankings and you have a much more robust system then "please rate this book out of 5 stars".

Gtex555 · 2 years ago
This reminds me of my favourite scene from the social network when movie Zuck gets the idea for facemash:

Billy Olson’s sitting here and had the idea of putting some of these next to pictures of farm animals and have people vote on who’s hotter. Yea, it’s on. I’m not gonna do the farm animals but I like the idea of comparing two people together. It gives the whole thing a very “Turing” feel since people’s ratings of the pictures will be more implicit than, say, choosing a number to represent each person’s hotness like they do on hotornot.com. The first thing we’re going to need is a lot of pictures.

Gtex555 commented on Making Blogs Popular Again    · Posted by u/sebastianprada
scyzoryk_xyz · 3 years ago
You lost me at “recommendation engine”. I want to follow users and subject specific hashtags. I want control. I want privacy. Not greedy black box AI BS. Plenty free options for content exist today and I am perfectly happy barely paying for anything as is.

The problem you describe is not a problem. Think about drastically narrowing the scope. Find a couple users in some extremely underserved niché and study them instead of the developers here. Solve problems that come out from what they tell you/what you see.

Gtex555 · 3 years ago
Without some level of recommendation engine wouldn't you need to pre-emptively know the blogs you want to follow already in which case what is the point of the site. What you are saying applies to a social network like facebook but could never work for blogs or youtube where you actually want to be exposed to new and interesting content.
Gtex555 commented on Making Blogs Popular Again    · Posted by u/sebastianprada
Gtex555 · 3 years ago
The only way to stop a blogging site from being filled with crap is to limit uploads to lets say 12 per account , but give extra upload credits to blogs that get views or read time (however you calculate that). That way someone who wants to spam without providing good content is limited to only 12 posts.
Gtex555 commented on Ask HN: Are you still tipping on takeout/pickup orders?    · Posted by u/yuppie_scum
dontbenebby · 3 years ago
>No. I'm over the growth of tipping culture. I've actually started tipping less

What a rude, entitled, antisocial attitude. What happens if everyone collectively decides you can stay home and cook your own food and make your own... drinks?

And what specific actions have you taken to ensure those workers are paid at least minimum wage, and that said minimum wage is in line with inflation similar to what is was, oh say, back under the times of Reagan that so many pine for when folks like yourself probably would have had your income above 100ish k taxed at 50%?[1]

IMO, if you can't afford both the tip and the meal, stay home, lest someone assume your startup or company is failing and short your stock or refuse to buy your products/services.

(And spoiler alert: This poster is not a barista, has never been a barista, and will literally put a bullet their own head before they go to what they endured like ten years of STEM school to avoid.)

[1] https://taxfoundation.org/historical-income-tax-rates-bracke...

Gtex555 · 3 years ago
If the tip is mandatory include it in the price or shut up

u/Gtex555

KarmaCake day19March 15, 2021View Original