Readit NewsHowever, everyone was so busy thinking about being a better version of Windows and Mac that for the most part we didn’t think about phones. Windows and make themselves fell by the wayside to iOS and android.
Retro computer enthusiasts tend to use the "real" MsDOS or other era correct DOSses, so this isn't really a market where FreeDOS is used much.
Also, you don't need a different DOS for newer computers. As long as it has a BIOS compat mode, most flavors of x86 DOS will run just fine. This might change is the 16bit mode gets finally removed. If something can't run DOS, then it's technically not a spec-compliant PC.
As for reliability, well, that's your problem now, good luck!
> point some metal out of their window and the neighborhood would be happy?
You might, but the FCC won't
Neither that or the plane powerplant are unsolavle problem, it's more of a "why would we invest this much to solve something this silly". Apparently the russians are trying to resurrect their SLAM clone and tested one. How much of this is a realistic military project versus propaganda isn't super clear to me. It's up there along with the manned military space stations in the scale of pointless deterrent PR.
Previous launches of the X-37B have been on a Falcon 9 with an RTLS landing, and now this one is using one of the largest launchers there is.
What is it doing with all that delta-v!?
In an elliptical orbit, you can cross the Van Hallen belt and magnetic fields over and over again. Then after a couple years return those samples to earth for study. This gives you valuable data to build better satellites in the future.
For examples, the gyros flywheel on the Hubble and it's sibling spy telescope failed over and over until they realized the radiations caused some arcing in the bearings which degraded them much faster than predicted. When you spend billions on individual satellites, this isn't the kind of thing you want to discover in orbit.
My use of Wayland (and for a lot of users , I suspect) is mostly just flowing with all the upstream distribution defaults. Do you expect the number of awesome-on-X users to dwindle or continue for the foreseeable future? My main concern with regards to switching to AwesomeWM would be whether I’ll be left stranded if the rest of the Linux ecosystem moves on.
Also, any pointers to the 80% attempts?
There is no such things. Unless they remove xorg from the repository, then it's just an entry in the session login screen as it always was.
> Also, any pointers to the 80% attempts?
Waycooler rewrite 2 and rewrite 3 are close enough. There's some private implementations that are more recent and more complete, but not released and probably wont ever be. Being a FLOSS maintainer these days isn't very enjoyable (disclaimer: opinions are my own), I can relate to their reticence to open the floodgates. There's one based on wlroot FFI floating around on Discord.
Then there's a bunch of doomed attempts by people who just made the same mistakes as the ones before them, but had too much ego/enthusiasm to acknowledge how it was going to end. The problem with Wayland is that it's hype-y. People who fall into the hype tend to fall into all the hyped techs at the same time. Which means shiny Rust frameworks and edgy code generators. Then all those things are dead a couple months later and whatever depends on them also die. The only way a working AwesomeWM Wayland port can be made is using boring old glib event loops and boring old service-client architecture of xorg. Anything else will not be compatible, so the plugins and existing configs wont work, thus nobody will use it even if it was somehow internally usable. People with a lot of time and grand ideas don't tend to like boring/mature/old techs and backward compatibility. I can't blame them either, why would they.
Yup that was exactly the problem and how I solved it too. If I remember correctly if workspace1 has client A and B, and workspace2 has client B and C (B is common), global stack means if I switch from 1 to 2 while focus was on A, while in 2 if I ever switch focus to B, then I when I come back to 1 I would find that focus moved from A to B, which can be annoying.
While I have you here, do you think 4.4 is still years away? Is there an ongoing documentation of API changes?
I/we were never very fond of releases to be honest. All it does is to fragment the number of version in the various LTS distribution, which makes support a pain (vs "the official version" and "git-master"). Also, I don't have that much time these days, so getting a release out is impractical. I am aiming for the Ubuntu 24.04 cutoff for packages.
> Is there an ongoing documentation of API changes?
`git log` ;). But also, just compare the official release doc with the development one. There's over 1k changes. The largest one being the documentation itself. Then a rewrite of the notification and wallpaper APIs are also rather large improvements. Everything is backward compatible, so there should not be any nasty surprises.
> Yup that was exactly the problem and how I solved it too. If I remember correctly if workspace1 has client A and B, and workspace2 has client B and C (B is common), global stack means if I switch from 1 to 2 while focus was on A, while in 2 if I ever switch focus to B, then I when I come back to 1 I would find that focus moved from A to B, which can be annoying.
Annoying, but also like >10k lines of code/tests/doc to "fix". It will take a lot of effort to get this PR merged without behavior changes or regressions... That global stack goes back 15 years and everything depends on it's exact behavior. It's as ossified as it gets.
I wonder if a project that replaces the "chrome" of GIMP with a different UX would be viable. Imagine a reworked menu / shortcut / dialog system that controls the unchanged core. Even better, imagine UI and UX to be live-tweakable, written in Python / Lua / Guile / you name it. That would make discovering better UI layouts and better UX flows absurdly easier.
(Yes, as an Emacs user, I want more software to be like Emacs.)