Readit News logoReadit News
Declanomous commented on Dear Bureaucrat, my job wants me to lie   federaltimes.com/your-car... · Posted by u/David_Reed
schreiaj · 7 years ago
I've never experienced one that wouldn't let me read it before I signed it.

I thought it was particularly interesting that I was referred to another doctor inside the same medical system sharing an EHR (ie they already HAD my data)and I still had to sign aa new HIPAA form less than a week later. That was the single time I didn't insist on reading the whole thing, I asked them if they were the exact forms used across the entire hospital system, I double checked one of them, and then just signed the rest.

My real fun experience with this was when I bought a house, one thing said I had to move in within 30 days, another 60 days, and another 15 days. There were also various other date discrepancies on when certain things had been completed and, they had used my full name (first, middle, last) in some places and just first/last in others. Man everyone was mad I was reading everything before I signed it though.

Declanomous · 7 years ago
I read everything put in front of me when I bought my car. Boy was the finance guy pissed, cause it took me like an hour, and he makes his living upselling add-ons and stuff.

I'm also a pretty fast reader, so it is pretty obvious that they absolutely expect you to not read whatever it is you are signing, because I assume that it would take most other people well over an hour to read.

Declanomous commented on When Women Outrun Men   thewalrus.ca/when-male-ru... · Posted by u/kaboro
Mountain_Skies · 7 years ago
It is my understanding that humans generally are limited to converting about 0.8% of the body fat into usable energy per day. If women generally have more body fat, then they would be able to yield more energy from it before hitting the 0.8% limit (which likely is spread out over the day especially in endurance events). Or there might even be some variance in that 0.8% limit, with women being able to convert a bit more per day than men. This would fly in the face of the conventional wisdom that women have a more difficult time losing weight than men. Certainly would be an interesting possibility to study.
Declanomous · 7 years ago
Well recent studies have actually found that women have a different catabolism than men. Women also switch to catabolism while they still have glycogen remaining in their muscles, meaning they don't build up as much lactic acid.

This flies in the face of conventional wisdom because all of the original studies were only done on men.

Off the top of my head, I'm not sure if women do have a harder time losing weight than men, but I know that a woman's body reacts to starvation differently. That may play a role.

There is a massive need for "foundational" studies to be redone with women. The assumption that men and women have the same metabolism has been shown to be wrong, and it has a lot of broad and overarching implications, especially in the field of medicine.

Declanomous commented on When Women Outrun Men   thewalrus.ca/when-male-ru... · Posted by u/kaboro
fromthestart · 7 years ago
>I think the fact that you are willing to chalk up the fact that women are winning these races on occasion to there not being enough elite runners has signs of a similar chauvanism.

Or maybe it has to do with the fact that men drastically outperform women in almost any other physical trial, and this therefore has the markings of a statistical anomaly? What's with this desperation to explain away any differences with accusations of sexism?

What's next? Chauvanism is the reason we believe that men can lift heavier weights than women?

Declanomous · 7 years ago
Men generally have the potential to be stronger than women, yes, but in general men are only stronger than women and larger than women, neither of which is particularly meaningful in endurance racing.

I replied to the comment above you in greater depth, but basically endurance appears to be something that women have the potential to be better at than men. If this strikes you as wrong, well, it's probably because it challenges your conception of male superiority rather than because of any innate advantage that men actually have.

Declanomous commented on When Women Outrun Men   thewalrus.ca/when-male-ru... · Posted by u/kaboro
insickness · 7 years ago
> you are willing to chalk up the fact... has signs of a similar chauvanism.

You were making a good point until the ad hominem. The personal attack makes me want to discount everything you said.

Declanomous · 7 years ago
I'm sorry you feel that way. Regardless of your feelings on the matter, the claim that women beat men occasionally because of a small sample size is chauvinistic, regardless of whether or not it was intended to be.

Unlike other events, where strength is a limiting factor (for instance, sprint speed is limited by muscle mass), there isn't much of a reason to believe that women would be worse at distance running.

For instance, the same line of logic would be 100% chauvinistic if someone said "The best engineer in this field is a woman, but it's a narrow field, I assume the sample size is very small."

People used to make very similar claims about the inferior mental capacity of women as they do about physical performance now. Yes, men outperform women in feats of strength, however, in many sporting disciplines the fact that men continue to outperform women is most likely due to the fact that men are generally encouraged to participate in sport to a greater degree than women, and sporting communities are more welcoming to men.

The author of the comment I replied to has no basis for his claim that the sample size accounts for the women winning beyond a feeling that men are superior athletes in all ways. That is chauvinism, and if that claim makes you feel uncomfortable or angry, perhaps you should reflect on why that is.

Declanomous commented on When Women Outrun Men   thewalrus.ca/when-male-ru... · Posted by u/kaboro
chongli · 7 years ago
There's a whole lot of "might" and "maybe" being thrown around here. Honestly, I think the biggest factor in these longer distances is the smaller sample size. There just aren't as many elite athletes competing at the ultra distances as there are at marathon and shorter distances.

The article throws in a bit of speculation about how men might be socialized to run too hard at the beginning of a race. I disagree. That observation says, to me, that the men competing in these events are not as well trained, not as experienced.

Look at the men's marathon and you'll see everyone taking it easy at the beginning of the race! They have to hire people to push the pace in the beginning because the elite runners don't want to do it. That directly contradicts the speculation about male socialization.

Declanomous · 7 years ago
There's actually very substantial differences in the metabolism inside of muscles for men and women. Nobody realized this because literally every study that created baselines for what was going on inside the muscles in relation to the metabolites that ended up in the blood was done with men. So when women were later included in studies they just used the blood workup or VO2 to estimate energy expenditure and the like, and it turns out those are nearly completely wrong.

Long story short, women switch to catabolism way earlier than men, while they still have glycogen inside their muscles. Men don't switch to catabolism until after they are completely out of glycogen and are creating fucktons of lactic acid. Since your muscles run on glycogen, and lactic acid is not a great thing to have kicking around, women actually appear to have a better metabolism for endurance.

Unfortunately a lot of doctors and researchers are men, and are extremely dismissive of the idea that there is any reason to actually study women, instead inventing behavioral reasons for why you don't always get the same results for men and women in studies.

I think the fact that you are willing to chalk up the fact that women are winning these races on occasion to there not being enough elite runners has signs of a similar chauvanism.

(This is mostly off the top of my head, but I have a degree in biology and I have studied metabolism fairly extensively)

Declanomous commented on Have we forgotten to make heat traps? (2012)   esbe.eu/it/en/news/have-w... · Posted by u/vq
Scoundreller · 7 years ago
> They take FOREVER to warm up a house after a set back, so don't bother with a deep setback overnight

This is incredibly true in intermittently occupied areas. Just heating the air is one thing. Heating everything around it just to get warm is another.

If you're in a private/semi-private office 9-5, having your own heater or window A/C gives you a lot of control and is incredibly efficient since you can turn it on/off with your work hours.

It will cycle a lot because the envelope doesn't change temperature much (eventually heating/cooling the air), but you reduce consumption a lot by not getting to the point of majorly heating/cooling the envelope, just the air (which is what matters unless a mattress is involved).

Declanomous · 7 years ago
Yeah, exactly. I like to have it relatively cold at night, so with forced air I set the heat to come on about 15-20 minutes before I want to get out of bed, and turn off 15 minutes after I leave for the day.

With radiant heat, if I want it to be 55 while I'm sleeping, and 70 when I leave my bed, my heat will come on 2 hours before I'm going to get up, and the temperature will slowly increase over that time, leading to it being far too warm about an hour before I intend to get up. The heater turns off as the house gets up to temp, but the radiators thermal mass is such that they are still quite hot when I leave for the day, in effect heating the house long after I've left.

Furthermore, it's basically impossible to have zone heat with one-pipe systems, and it's much more difficult with two pipe systems. (This is less of a problem with hot water though).

With forced air, you can install active vents fairly easily, and while you still can't cut off TOO many of the vents at once, lest you cause too much back-pressure in the system, it is fairly easy to heat one side of your house or one floor of your house.

On top of all that, steam doesn't handle short-cycling well, so you have to accept a wider swing in temp than you do with forced air.

Declanomous commented on SAT to Add ‘Adversity Score’ That Rates Students’ Hardships   nytimes.com/2019/05/16/us... · Posted by u/ckinnan
fuzz4lyfe · 7 years ago
>I’m getting pushed further and further to the right.

Maybe not, it feels like to me that the Overton window[0] has been sliding left. My views on freedom of speech made me a 'leftist commie' when I used them to defend South Park and Eminem now most often I'm accused being 'alt-right' by those who disagree with those same views.

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window

Declanomous · 7 years ago
Based on the views you have espoused here, I would not call you a leftist commie. It sounds like freedom of speech is your number 1 concern, which would be in character for someone with views that could be considered alt-right. Maybe you are a libertarian, which could otherwise be referred to as an anarch-capatalist, but libertarianism is in no way a leftist movement.

While South Park and Eminem both 'triggered' a lot of people because of their use of obscenity, neither is leftist in any way, shape or form. South Park regularly attacks anyone who tries to change society, which is in no way a leftist mindset. As for Eminem, I can't think of a single example of left-leaning thought in any of them outside of freedom of speech.

In general I think you'd have a very hard time making the claim that the overton window is sliding to the left. Maybe the overton window is moving to the left for gender identity and sexual expression, but that is about it. The right has succeeded in moving the overton window substantially in their favor in most social and economic programs.

Declanomous commented on Have we forgotten to make heat traps? (2012)   esbe.eu/it/en/news/have-w... · Posted by u/vq
tomkinstinch · 7 years ago
Hot water "hydronic" heating with radiators is very common in the US as well, at least among homes in the Northeastern US constructed before the 1960s. It's a shame more new construction does not use hot water heating in conjunction with central air for cooling because radiators are much quieter, more efficient, and better for those with asthma.
Declanomous · 7 years ago
I live in a house with steam heat. Steam systems often get converted to hot water, but in general I have a few observations related to radiated heat.

1) Steam and other radiant systems don't deal with temperature setbacks well. They take FOREVER to warm up a house after a set back, so don't bother with a deep setback overnight, and if you are gonna turn down the heat because you are going to be gone for a while, expect your house to be cold for a couple of hours while it warms back up, or expect your heat to overshoot by 5-10 degrees.

2) Radiant heat seems to work well in the temperature range it is designed for, but outside of that range you get strong temperature gradients in rooms. Unless you have a fan in each room, expect the ceiling to be substantially warmer than the floor. I have 12 foot ceilings, and the ceiling can be 15 - 20 degrees warmer.

3) I personally prefer forced air with my allergies than radiant heat, because you can upgrade a forced-air system to use better filters, which basically gives you a filter for your entire house. Radiators are a pain in the ass to keep clean, and the air often seems to go stale over time. I have fairly bad indoor allergies and it just feels like over winter the house just fills with allergens.

4) On the same note, you can't get whole-house humidifiers with steam heat, nor can you easily add air conditioning.

5) Steam isn't THAT quiet. An improperly tuned system will bang (which shouldn't count against steam, because that's the fault of whoever is maintaining the system), one-pipe systems (which are common in Chicago) hiss when they are heating up, the valves sputter as they die, and when the system cools back down there is a loud inrush of air. Two pipe systems make noise as they heat up and joints flex, and the valves also make little clicking sounds.

Hot water can get bubbles in it and make wooshing sounds, but that's generally a sign of bad maintenance.

The sound of air blowing bothers me less in general than one off sounds that occur with steam and hot water though, and unless you don't mind the aforementioned temperature gradients you'll need to have a fan running anyways.

6) It's much much easier to find people who know how to work on forced air in the US. Replacement parts are easier to find, and forced air is usually more efficient.

One big benefit to steam is that old systems were massively oversized for the houses they are in. My house had absolutely NO problem getting up to temp during the week we had below zero temps. It was running a lot though, and the leaking shutoff valves and blurbling air vents were starting to drive me nuts, so I shut off the heat for a couple of hours on the coldest day (which got down to -40 or so) to do repairs. It got down to about 40 degrees inside before I turned the heat back on, and once it was back on it got up to 70 or so no problem. I know a lot of people who had more modern systems that struggled to maintain 40 or 50 degrees.

Side note: If anyone has a steam heat system in their home, I would highly recommend picking up The Lost Art of Steam Heating by Dan Holohan. As I mentioned, it's hard to find a real steam heating expert nowadays, most of the time you'll just get plumbers who are moonlighting. While steam heat involves plugging pipes together, there are a lot more things to take into account other than whether pipe A and pipe B are connected.

Declanomous commented on Court Says Using Chalk on Tires for Parking Enforcement Violates Constitution   npr.org/2019/04/23/716248... · Posted by u/codezero
Stratoscope · 7 years ago
Cities all around the SF Bay Area have been removing their red light cameras. Here in Menlo Park the city just dropped ours. And about time! They were widely hated for mailing people fake tickets for minor infractions that were not a safety hazard at all, like slowly rolling through a right turn with no other traffic in the vicinity.
Declanomous · 7 years ago
I used to be annoyed by red light cameras because they triggered on "safe" infractions, like right turns on red. Over the past few years I've changed my mind, because I've almost been hit as a pedestrian and on my bike by people sliding through intersections, to the point where I've physically prevented myself from being hit by pushing off the car a couple times.

Right on red is awesome as a driver, but it makes roads really dangerous for other road users. I think bad intersection design is partly to blame for perceived "frivolous" red light tickets, but at the same time I think that drivers really should come to a complete stop before the line (and before the crosswalk if there is one) before deciding if a right turn on red is safe or practicable. If people can't even be bothered to stop for a right turn on red then it's probably better to ban them outright.

Also, I've seen enough people run red lights 2-3 seconds after the light changes that I want red light cameras at every intersection anyways. It might be 1 in every 250 people who gets dinged for the right turn on red ticket, but that's stupidly dangerous.

If a fix is needed, increase the fine for blowing the light, scale it based on the time the light had been red (so you don't excessively punish people who got caught in the zone of indecision), and reduce the fine for rolling through a right on red.

Declanomous commented on Is Amazon Violating U.S. Antitrust Laws?   inthesetimes.com/article/... · Posted by u/walterbell
sokoloff · 7 years ago
Amazon seems to think that I’m a real vacuum aficionado/collector as well.

It’s quite possible that those are still the best items to recommend to us, to mop up any “unhappy with the one they got, so save them with a return/rebuy” sales.

Declanomous · 7 years ago
I wouldn't be surprised if the actual reason was they are capturing extra sales from people who bought something, liked it a lot, and then bought another to give to their kids or for their second home. My mom buys me random chotchkies all the time after she bought them and liked them, and if my parents were well off I could easily see her buying me a vacuum or a new mattress after she got herself one.

For 99% of people that probably doesn't happen, but the people with the money to do that probably spend a TON of money, so they are worth targeting with ads.

u/Declanomous

KarmaCake day3779April 8, 2016
About
Lead Data Engineer genetic agrotech startup
View Original