Readit Newshttps://twitter.com/GrapheneOS/status/1511593168667611139?s=...
There's a long video from Techlore which presents the CalyxOS side of the picture and places the blame with GrapheneOS leadership: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dx7CZ-2Bajg .
Why would hospitals admit someone who isn't actually in need of care? If you need hospital care for Covid, it's (almost exclusively) because you need supplemental oxygen, and that's something that's pretty hard to fake.
Edit: the question is: how are these hospitalizations actually done practically. Are doctors faking diagnoses (e.g. hypoxia), convincing patients they need care, which they are persuaded to accept? Or are patients forcibly admitted without being asked?
a. They are asked to get admitted "for observation because they are at high risk". If they ask to leave, the doctors ask them to sign a very scary sounding wavier disclaiming the hospital of responsibility for their death.
b. There apparently this one lab that will return a positive covid test if the docs ask them to and they get a cut of what the patient pays.
It needs to be said that I don't know if any of these are true.
"Reliance Jio will soon start selling an Android phone which they have called Jiophone next, and it will cost Rs. 3500... probably."
This is total spam. The title has nothing to do with the content of the article... The phone isn't introduced by Google, it's introduced by:
> Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited, doing business as Jio
and guess what, the article is total speculation:
> As far as the pricing is concerned, JioPhone could be priced as low as INR 3499.
Emphasis on 'could be' added by me. It isn't released yet and apparently the author is just guessing what it could cost... based on what?
Besides, how is it surprising that this is subsidized? This device is network locked and handicapped.
Jio phones are totally handicapped. They don't even allow users to open a wifi hotspot because that would compete with their wireless routers. Maybe that's what they are 'collaborating with google' on.
This isn't news it's an advertisement.
Deleted Comment
Almost every IVR I have ever used makes me believe business invest in making sure people can't call or at least have a very hard time reaching a human.
It's stable? It's fast? It works? No bugs have been reported on it for years?
Regardless of how I 'feel' about that piece of code, I objectively should _not_ touch it.
It's the only way to see new videos from creators I care about.
Developers have the right to say how they want their code to be used in the same way that authors have the right to say how their books can be used.
The code in a public repository doesn't have to be "free" for developers any more than publically downloadable piece of software has to be "free" for end-users.
For example, Microsoft offers a freely downloadable windows iso which people are not allowed to use use without a license.