Gotta strongly disagree on this. For example, I know there's a way to get to the app switching screen, which shows all of the apps in a grid. You just have to drag up from the bottom the right amount in order to get the grid to stay. Despite knowing this, I fail to do it half the times I try. I just can't figure out how much to "drag" up from the bottom. Too much or too little and it just doesn't work. So frustrating. And so many other similar examples.

They are both admitting that Flatpak gives a terrible user experience and making Flatpak the only way for users to install apps.

Strange design.

Is there any RSS reader that is also able to subscribe to newsletters in some way? There are lot of contents that are only provided as newsletters nowadays and I wanted to be able to read my feed and newsletters in the same app, without going into my mail inbox.

People just confidently stating stuff like "current LLMs basically pass the Turing test" makes me feel like I've secretly been given much worse versions of all the LLMs in some kind of study. It's so divorced from my experience of these tools, I genuinely don't really understand how my experience can be so far from yours, unless "basically" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.

But where's the source? I just see a binary blob, what makes it open source?

Post author here. There shouldn't be one on the website (and I can't see one?), but the Google Play developer profile is unfortunate: thanks for pointing it out.

Confused me too.

Did AMD not know?

Or did AMD know and not care?