Readit News logoReadit News
Posted by u/w108bmg 4 months ago
Show HN: Doxx – Terminal .docx viewer inspired by Glowgithub.com/bgreenwell/dox...
I got tired of open file.docx → wait 8 seconds → close Word just to read a document, so I built a terminal-native Word viewer!

What it does:

* View `.docx` files directly in your terminal with (mostly) proper formatting

* Tables actually look like tables (with Unicode borders!)

* Nested lists work correctly with indentation

* Full-text search with highlighting

* Copy content straight to clipboard with `c`

* Export to markdown/CSV/JSON

Why I made this:

Working on servers over SSH, I constantly hit Word docs I needed to check quickly. The existing solutions I'm aware of either strip all formatting (docx2txt) or require GUI apps. Wanted something that felt as polished as [glow](https://github.com/charmbracelet/glow) but for Word documents.

The good stuff:

* 50ms startup vs Word's 8+ seconds

* Works over SSH (obviously)

* Preserves document structure and formatting

* Smart table alignment based on data types

* Interactive outline view for long docs

Built with Rust + ratatui and heavily inspired by Charm's [glow](https://github.com/charmbracelet/glow) package for viewing Markdown in the CLI (built in Go)!

    # Install
    cargo install --git https://github.com/bgreenwell/doxx
    
    # Use
    doxx quarterly-report.docx
Still early but handles most Word docs I throw at it. Always wanted a proper Word viewer in my terminal toolkit alongside `bat`, `glow`, and friends. Let me know what you think!

zvr · 4 months ago
Wonderful project; loved the speed and responsiveness.

But a humble request: please make sure that the planned "AI integration" is completely optional, not compiled-in, or, even better, a sister project ("aidoxx"?).

Having the functionality of sending the contents of a Word document to any external service will be a red flag and block adoption of this tool in many environments.

stavros · 4 months ago
I'm usually not averse to AI in things, but I agree with you, any online functionality in a cli tool would make our security team ban a tool, and with good reason.
freedomben · 4 months ago
The name of the took would certainly be ironic if they add this...
nirava · 4 months ago
+1 to this. The AI stuff should be a different tool that I can pipe stuff into:

`doxx document.docs | doxxAI`

Even without any of the bad vibes around AI, it is just much more aesthetic and wonderful if the core doxx util was a single purpose command.

Also, it is open source so if it's sufficiently useful, someone will spin off a AI stripped down version anyways, and that'll probably gain more users/goodwill in the kind of CLI SSH dev niche market this tool is trying to fit in.

treetalker · 4 months ago
Great project! Looking forward to trying it out in my law practice.

The name causes miscues and carries negative connotations, though, on account of its homonym verb (doxxing).

w108bmg · 4 months ago
It's 100% intentional wordplay! "Doxxing" documents by exposing their contents in the terminal instead of keeping them locked in Microsoft Word. The whole project is about "liberation from Office" so the pun felt perfect. I'm honestly not too creative so I was bouncing around with Google Gemini on some "clever" names.
rafram · 4 months ago
Some people may not want to have a tool called "doxx" installed on their work machines, FWIW.
ThreatSystems · 4 months ago
I am genuinely curious, as to how this would be a solution for a law practice? How many lawyers are SSH'd into servers? Or am I being ignorant?
btown · 4 months ago
As a non-lawyer who’s nonetheless been asked to help to review internal documents en masse - the idea of a fully scriptable <50ms switch time between documents is quite appealing. AI can help with initial screening, but there are many situations where humans are asked or required to do review at scale.
Eldt · 4 months ago
It doesn't have to be used over SSH, some lawyers might be comfortable using the terminal for local work
treetalker · 4 months ago
I hate Word but sometimes have to deal with it when I would rather just have plain text. (Among other reasons, Word is notorious for making it difficult to select text to copy and paste, especially when dealing with legal citations and quotations.) Furthermore, the structure of documents is important to understanding them, especially in the law. So it seems like it would be useful to work with the text of the documents without locking horns with M$.

Scripting uses interest me too. Perhaps pandoc will still be a better option, but I'm also a sucker for TUIs and _Charm projects!

nine_k · 4 months ago
The name could rather be docc, along the lines of thicc,
Imustaskforhelp · 4 months ago
Yea I like this one, I feel like they should change the name but maybe that's just my opinion and the author is free to do what they want with the project's name.

But still doxx feels like it would just get some unwarranted attention when its unnecessary and docc seems a nice enough name too.

I mean, the project seems fantastic but still the project seems quite new and I don't think that it would suffer anything from a name change.

Tmpod · 4 months ago
Was thinking the same. Might be worth looking into renaming the project, to prevent situations like that for both maintainers and users.
ashton314 · 4 months ago
Very cool!

I did something like this with pandoc:

    pandoc -s -t man "$1" | groff -T utf8 -man | ${PAGER:-less}
Keeps a lot or formatting. My favorite way to read a README file in the terminal

piker · 4 months ago
Hey this looks really awesome. Super helpful for those of us who are building in the document space for debugging if nothing else. Here are a couple of other projects for you to develop with / on if you aren't already using them:

- https://github.com/mikeebowen/OOXML-Validator (if you plan on making edits, you'll want to ensure they're renderable by other Word users)

- https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=yuenm18.... (incredible VS code extension for debugging OOXML files)

One thing that will surprise a lot of users is how common old-style Word (.doc) files are still. For that you might consider integrating Antiword (https://github.com/grobian/antiword) if you can get comfortable with the licensing.

Be aware that styles play an important role in numbering that doesn't seem to be picked up here. So you'll want to apply the styles before calculating the numbering levels.

Over all really cool. Hit me up if you ever want to swap notes on Docx and Rust. My email is in my profile.

Keep it up!

xvilka · 4 months ago
Instead of Antiword, maybe using LibreOffice parsers directly would solve the problem for parsing all kinds of the documents.
shazbotter · 4 months ago
Installing something named "doxx" and executing it sounds like a top ten bad idea for computer users.

Needs a new name, or a certain percentage of the audience will nope out before you even get to explain what it does.

majkinetor · 4 months ago
This looks great, I hope we will have releases for Windows soon. It really does going to my nerves to install MS Office on new machine, and recently I stopped doing that and use Office 365 free version to view and edit docs instead, which is way worst regarding efficiency and privacy, but at least I don't have it on my machine. Its a shame there is no stripped down version of Word that lets me just view docx files and do most basic editing and commenting, that can be installed with winget in seconds. I use markdown for everything, but in enterprise environment when I send markdown to people they convert it to Word and return it back...

BTW, 8 seconds to start Word? What kind of computer are you using? Word is not performance beast but its not that slow either.

jbgt · 4 months ago
LibreOffice is a food alternative if you just want simple Word management.

Of course it's a big install on the other hand.

majkinetor · 4 months ago
I like the typo :)

I tried it, but some documents are not shown correctly as far as I remember.

_def · 4 months ago
Far tangent: does anyone else feel pressured when viewing a document in google docs and it's visible that a coworker is (or could) also viewing it, and seeing your cursor etc?
sjsdaiuasgdia · 4 months ago
My favorite version of this is when someone is introduced to the idea that others can see when they select a range of text by seeing their selection show up on the view of the doc being presented to the video conf.
BrouteMinou · 4 months ago
It looks fantastic! That's going into my toolbox that's for sure.

It's refreshing to see something that isn't another chatbot.