Readit News logoReadit News
ohjeez · a year ago
LeoPanthera · a year ago
This should be the URL in the post, Twitter requires a login, Bluesky doesn't.
s1mplicissimus · a year ago
I dislike twitter just as much as the next guy, but i was able to read the conversation without logging in. EU exit point here. Maybe that plays a role?

having to click through each single image is quiet the turn-off though. not missing the platform

weberer · a year ago
b212 · a year ago
As much as I hate Twitter I was unable to read this @ Bluesky at my iPhone 13 Mini because left/right arrows covered words, this is a mobile design straight from the mid 00s. So bad.
raviisoccupied · a year ago
Thank you for linking this
buildbot · a year ago
Seems like Zuckerberg had already made up his mind and needed an engineer to positively confirm his desired path through a very power imbalanced chat...

No shade towards the engineer at all, but besides the very first "My instinct is” comment the engineer literally could have just been ChatGPT and Zuck would have gotten a similar convo.

pinkmuffinere · a year ago
I don't feel that the engineer answered poorly at all. They're answering a really broad strategic question, with no / very little hard data to go off of -- of course their answer is vague, there's very little certainty about anything in the question (not even price of acquisition!). I think they accurately call out the benefits and risks of the different paths. IMO this is as much as can be expected. Before "pulling trigger" on any of these decisions, there will have to be a lot more analysis, negotiation, etc, that they're just not going to get to in a dm. If the engineer was the kind of person to give a single definitive answer in this situation, I don't think they would be trusted with this kind of conversation.
buildbot · a year ago
I completely agree, they answered as you or I would have, or even better; if we were in the same situation!

It’s more interesting that Zuckerberg would ask this, at least to me.

NoboruWataya · a year ago
In fairness if the founder and CEO pings me and asks me who the company should buy, you can bet I'm giving a similarly hand wavy bullshit answer.
ajkjk · a year ago
that's so weird, I would be honest; it wouldn't even occur to me not to be. maybe that's why I never get involved in any internal politics.
rich_sasha · a year ago
I'm not sure it's a bullshit answer at all. They present pros and cons. Zuck can then take them into consideration, given wider strategic consideration.

Much more useful than "this one".

Deleted Comment

buildbot · a year ago
Oh yeah 100%, me too!
ysofunny · a year ago
if this cartoon [1] is a reliable source, then maybe it's not (or possibly didn't used to be) such a strange thing at facebook

[1] https://bonkersworld.net/organizational-charts

ce4 · a year ago
I dont think one could reason that. Maybe some insight: The author is an engineer and had worked at Google and published the Goomics strip internally. It is also available at https://goomics.net/62

PS: Later he worked at Twitter and commented that also: https://twittoons.com/

croisillon · a year ago
i think it was more a reference to their (old) welcome page https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-facebook-social-network-in...
grugagag · a year ago
Yeah, I've seen this one before but it never ceases to amuse me.
s1mplicissimus · a year ago
I had the same thought, this sounds like ChatGPT! Then again, doesn't most corporate communication? Or maybe it's the other way round and ChatGPT sounds like corporate fluff because it was trained like that?
brookst · a year ago
From the perspective of the “engineer”’s responses, I’m guessing by this is a VERY senior engineer, maybe a technical fellow or whatever Facebook calls them.
lumost · a year ago
Also possible that he pinged a random junior engineer for a fresh perspective. Social media trends tend to start with a younger audience. However the engineers’s comment on team assets implies seniority.
buildbot · a year ago
Yeah, like just below the CTO or whoever probably. Even then they just quickly switch to just kinda bouncing the whatever Zuck comes up with back at them.
1vuio0pswjnm7 · a year ago
[Discussing Instagram prior to Facebook acquisition.]

"Mark: Hmm. Engagement metrics?

Engineer: 23 mins daily per user. Teens. 94% return weekly. But here's the kicker: Their EXIF scraper tags locations silently. Imagine layering that with FB's graph. Hyper-local ads without asking.

Mark: Go on.

Engineer: They're a Trojan horse."

hiyer · a year ago
So who was the engineer?
oldgradstudent · a year ago
From Zuckerberg's messages, it appears that an important motivation for buying Instagram was to limit the competition facing Facebook.

Thanks Obama for enforcing the Sherman Antitrust Act:

> SECTION 1. Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is hereby declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make any contract or engage in any combination or conspiracy hereby declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on con-viction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court.

ripped_britches · a year ago
Title needs a date on it