Readit News logoReadit News
Posted by u/alhirzel 3 years ago
Ask HN: Google Search down?
I am getting the following message when performing searches:

Server Error We're sorry but it appears that there has been an internal server error while processing your request. Our engineers have been notified and are working to resolve the issue.

Please try again later.

breput · 3 years ago
https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/google-electrical-incide...

Three people in critical condition after Google data center 'electrical incident' in the Council Bluffs, Iowa datacenter (us-central region, I believe)

hoofhearted · 3 years ago
An arc blast isn’t anything to play with! It’s an electrically charged fireball that is 4 times hotter than the sun at the point of the arc. Pretty much instant 3rd degree burns, while simultaneously getting zapped and hit with an explosive shockwave.

https://youtu.be/-iClXrd50Z8https://youtu.be/PO6see7_ODY

shadowgovt · 3 years ago
The physics of those things is scary.

If I recall correctly, the mitigating PPE for expecting an arc flash is reflective, because so much of the energy imparted on a victim is straight-up electromagnetic radiation. You get lightbulbed to death.

dgrin91 · 3 years ago
Seems unrelated. This happened ~10 hours ago.
prescriptivist · 3 years ago
10 hours ago we had a flood of network failures in us-central1 and saw no GCP status changes. We blindly attempted to mitigate in various ways (freezing HPAs because we thought that we were making excessive calls to external infra and getting throttled) and it resolved itself eventually. Maybe we were at fault the entire time but not seeing this issue exposed up on the GCP dashboard is infuriating.
lupire · 3 years ago
Could be related if eng tried to route traffic away from Council Bluffs after the accident (shut down data center for safety inspection/repair?) and failed.
utopcell · 3 years ago
not at all relevant to this outage
breput · 3 years ago
Do you have anything to add about the root cause?
ontouchstart · 3 years ago
FirstLvR · 3 years ago
yeah am blaffed how good wikipedia is covering current events
cowmoo728 · 3 years ago
One time I was sitting in the New York metropolitan opera and heard Javier Camarena give an encore performance, which is quite rare. Immediately after the encore, it went to intermission. Once I walked out to the lobby, I checked his Wikipedia article on my phone and it had already been updated to note that he had just done an encore performance at the Met. It was insane how fast it was.
dylan604 · 3 years ago
How many 3rd party websites are available to corroborate these new edits?
antupis · 3 years ago
And how reliable Google services are that you can have that kind article.
gzer0 · 3 years ago
https://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/06/26/michael.jackson.internet...

This reminds me of the distant past. The death of Michael Jackson resulted in (almost literally) the entire internet suffering an outage.

habibur · 3 years ago
More than that on 9/11. Every news site, online forum any online resource for news you can think of was unaccessible for hours. TV turned out to be the only news source.
digitalsushi · 3 years ago
I was working at an ISP on 9/11. We were still online but none of our customers were getting anything (dialup modems) ... so people started calling our tech support number to read them the news. Or to get info about loved ones. That was a long day. I left a different person than I showed up as. Didn't we all though.
mkl · 3 years ago
I seem to remember Slashdot holding up.
wbl · 3 years ago
TV had two channels in NJ: a lot of stations liked the towers and it took them a few days to rig up alternates.
soraminazuki · 3 years ago
The difference in internet adoption rate between those two time periods likely plays a key role in that.
hedora · 3 years ago
Cell / landlines were dicey too.
marginalia_nu · 3 years ago
Google clearly saw my search engine's week-long outage as I reconstructed the index and felt confused and intimidated by the revelation that 89.9999% also is five nines.
toast0 · 3 years ago
Everybody wants nine nines, but you achieved eight eights, which is pretty close? :)
erklik · 3 years ago
Down in Sydney. Intermittent errors when searching.

How am I supposed to work? Also, I don't remember when Google Search was last down. Either google has great uptime, or I have terrible memory.

matheweis · 3 years ago
Bing works pretty well most of the time. I switched my personal primary search engine to bing around the beginning of this year after noticing a marked degradation of Google search quality.

In fact, anecdotally, Bing is markedly better at narrow search results (quoted phrases, excluding or including specific words, etc).

Google on the other hand is significantly better at what I’d call fuzzy searches, where you don’t know exactly what you’re looking for but have some vague idea (some esoteric spelling, or that type of apple that has unique properties but you can’t remember the name of, etc.)

theonemind · 3 years ago
I feel like I need to read the manual for specific Google searches. Sometimes, it seems to drop an important search term and not give a suggestion link to include it. +term doesn’t help sometimes. It seems like +”term” usually does.

It seems overfitted to delivering results with mass appeal. Perhaps I’ll try bing the next time I get that tingling feeling google will throw out the search terms intended to narrow down what I want to find.

collegeburner · 3 years ago
I've had to search stuff in bing because for some reason google had only the shitty mirror sites for github issues/stackoverflow/whatever indexed. I could literally do a quote search and not get the original source.
tamrix · 3 years ago
Using bing is just coding on hard mode.
nigelgutzmann · 3 years ago
My memory suffers more outages than Google Search for sure!
samstave · 3 years ago
Hi! My name is Sam.
pca006132 · 3 years ago
Try Duckduckgo? Indeed, I don't remember when Google search was down last time either.
matheweis · 3 years ago
DDG is mostly (but not all) Bing (context, yegg is the founder of DDG): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31492631https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31490994
narrator · 3 years ago
Go over to the dark side http://Yandex.com . It's the only thing that's decent that doesn't rely on Google or Bing.
midoridensha · 3 years ago
DDG is great, but as the other commenter said, it uses Bing mostly as its underlying search engine, which might not get you the results you're looking for (it's better at some things than Google, worse at others). For privacy though, DDG is great so I use it as my first-line search and then go to Google if I really need to.
zorpner · 3 years ago
> How am I supposed to work?

Whatever happened to the man pages, y'know.

jeffbee · 3 years ago
Am I the only person who primarily reads man pages on the web?
zbird · 3 years ago
You can work without being tracked and profiled here: https://duckduckgo.com/
Jerry2 · 3 years ago
DDG censors too much.
djsavvy · 3 years ago
Gonna use this as a chance to pub https://search.brave.com

I switched to this from DuckDuckGo several months ago because Brave uses their own index, while DDG famously uses Bing's. The results are a lot better in my experience and it feels like the search engine is built for me instead of for advertisers. Brave search just feels like cleaner, quieter tech. I've also never seen NSFW results on an innocuous search (a problem I had regularly with DDG). On the rare occasion I end up using Google, seeing the results page is a jarring (and slightly stressful) experience with all of the distractions and irrelevant results.

Dead Comment

redcitylights · 3 years ago
mmaunder · 3 years ago
Was broken for me a few mins ago with 500 errors on various searches.
jhickok · 3 years ago
Search is currently not working most of the time for me.
comboy · 3 years ago
It's been like that for years.
muser8 · 3 years ago
oh my, classic