Readit News logoReadit News
akmarinov · 4 years ago
Ok, can we finally get dual boot macOS/iPadOS on every M1 iPad now please? It'll immediately make the iPad one of the best laptops out there.
SheinhardtWigCo · 4 years ago
At this point it's the same OS with different UI shells, so they can do better than dual boot: instantly switch to the full macOS UI when a Magic Keyboard is connected, and even preserve the state of any running apps.
imglorp · 4 years ago
Why would they? You might not buy one of each platform if they weren't differentiated.
coldtea · 4 years ago
Cannibalizing themselves is something Apple does frequently.

They did it with the iPod to iPhone, for a famous example.

Shadonototra · 4 years ago
You pick a platform for a usecase, dualboot makes sense

Merging 2 usages into a single experience = you flop like Win8/Win11/Gnome/Unity8

On other hand Android/ChromeOS and macOS/iOS/iPadOS is a big winner

SheinhardtWigCo · 4 years ago
Buying one of each platform is a bug, not a feature. The goal is to maximize customer LTV. This hypothetical product could be strictly superior to _and_ more expensive than separate purchases of a MacBook and iPad.

I wouldn't expect to see this on the Air or even Pro models as standard; it makes sense as an expensive upgrade akin to the M1 Max.

swatcoder · 4 years ago
Highly capable touch-screen sensor-rich portables are carving out their own niche and that's been a great opportunity for shaking up some of the core ideas in system architecture and OS designs. This applies across all vendors for products in that class.

Not only would porting macOS to iPad disturb Apple's business proposition of "why not buy both?" but it would let up on the pressure that makes iPadOS itself evolve and solve problems in its own way.

I'd say just be patient and tablets will become what you want. The road to get there is a bit longer than "just port over the old stuff!" but that long road will probably keep surfacing exciting new innovations and paradigm-changes along the way.

tester89 · 4 years ago
I would rather iPadOS continue its journey to achieve parity with a "fullOS". iPadOS has a lot of new concepts about how we should be computing, and it would be a shame to throw it away for what we already have.

If dual boot ever becomes a thing, all momentum on improving iPadOS would probably just stop as "if you need PC-level features just use macOS".

freedomben · 4 years ago
Wouldn't this go firmly against Apple's philosophy of a tablet being "an appliance" (rather than a general purpose computer)?
eyelidlessness · 4 years ago
I don’t think they’ll put macOS on an iPad either, but they’ve been positioning the iPad as a computer for a long time. Even in marketing language at times.
tonyedgecombe · 4 years ago
I hope not, it’s too much of a compromise adding touch to a desktop os.
jonwinstanley · 4 years ago
Won’t be as good as a MacBook though, so I doubt they’ll do it
wil421 · 4 years ago
No for the same reason they don't allow multiple users. They want you to buy multiple devices.

Deleted Comment

elpakal · 4 years ago
It was awfully quiet over there! Glad to see some in person things coming back around though I wonder what capacity looks like compared to San Jose.
ghaff · 4 years ago
I'm seeing this pattern play out in a few places in the late spring. A mostly online event with a fairly small-scale, maybe invite-only, in-person component.
akmarinov · 4 years ago
Screwing over the international community, as is tradition within Apple.
ericlewis · 4 years ago
…and everyone else who doesn’t live in Cupertino.

Or maybe they’re just having a thing at their home and if you’re international and want to come and can afford it then do so.

unmole · 4 years ago
You do realise that you lose absolutely nothing of value by not watching it live, right?
ghaff · 4 years ago
A lot of companies have found that, while online participation is mostly watching video, far more can participate to at least that degree than ever could when a lot of these expensive, popular events were in-person only--with maybe a streaming keynote.
shmatt · 4 years ago
So the company who just can't innovate without forcing 165,000 employees back to office in April can't figure out how to run an in person event in June
mcphage · 4 years ago
How big would their office have to be to hold 165,000 people?