Where do you find people to validate your idea / MVP and get feedback from?
I've been building something over the past year that primarily scratches my own itch and I'm getting ready to use it myself but I was wondering how I could see if other people are interested in this as well.
I've read about landing pages and MVPs so that's kinda what I did: I've made something small, usable, that solves a single problem with myself as my user persona (i.e. scratching my own itch).
The problem I'm running into now is that I can't seem to gather any useful feedback and I don't know where to get that feedback, or how to get it. There are a few people registered on my site but none actually active enough for me to try and reach out to them.
How do you get feedback on your project / MVP without spamming HN or reddit in the hopes that one or two people leave a comment?
P.S. A fiverr clone for product owners or analysts might be what I'm looking for here.
You have two problems, not one. You need to get useful feedback out of 100pct of people, and you might need more people.
To get useful feedback, distill your potential value proposition to one sentence. If you have multiple ways of saying it, make a couple. But one sentence only and write it down.
When you have someone from the correct category (target market) on the phone, yes, you need a phone or video call, emit the potential value proposition sentence exactly as you have written it, not a word different.
Do not do any extra run up other than hi, how much time do you have, pleased to meet you...
Then, shut up. This is called 'the golden silence' in sales. and write down exactly the first thing they say.
The first thing they say is the truth, and you need to listen to it.
after that, you can try to dive in, and they might say they didn't understand at first, but the reality is people like to please people, and all that subsequent talk is secondary. The first reaction is what you bank on.
When you are going to market, you will put ad money, web site visits, whatever, into a single sentence, and it must resonate. Period. And it must resonate with your target market - you did remember to define your target market and potentially do a value proposition for each. There are a lot of target markets who don't buy the product (investors, influencers), but usually you do that only after you believe you have a thesis and resonating message.
Related, if you can distance yourself from the product. Don't be the founder, owner, creator. Act like some other third party who is getting feedback.
People often mask criticism, and rarely do people tell someone that their baby is ugly. ;)
The research, coupled with networking should identify types of prospects and how they do business.
From there, asking ones self whether the value can make sense should filter out gross misalignment, but not always!
Really understanding how organizations make their money is needed to target. Networking, shopping the value prop around should spark interest and potential research targets.
My experience with less sharp, more verbose variations on this show that results are colored by how they like you and that diminishes the clarity of the value information.
That said, it depends a lot on what type of product you are building. If you are building a consumer product, then throw some money at digital ads and drive some traffic towards your idea. If people are signing up but not using it, that's feedback right there. They are intrigued enough to sign up but find it lacking in some way to stick around. Fix one thing and see if that changes anything. If it does, great. If not, fix something else. Hint on what to fix, think about user engagement in steps. Always fix the first possible step that you know is not working. When users start crossing that step then go to the next one. Repeat until IPO.
As blindingly obvious as this is, I've never seen it put quite so concisely. Fantastic. I could've cut short so many bullshit discussions this way
Maybe I'm being picky here but I disagree a little bit with this. At the start, your MVP might just have been for you i.e. to scratch an itch you have and it is only later that you think about getting other people to use/pay for it. So maybe your above statement will (should??) apply if your MVP was targeted for the public
You are setting yourself up for a hell of a sales problem.
Will add that from experience, the suggestion of knocking down technical issues is so important it’s mandatory, and it does not stop once you get users, it will be required forever with a successful product. BUT! ... IMO it’s a very slow way to acquire users, and the engagement improvements are incremental at best, unless you are making sweeping changes or hit something viral (unlikely!!) or were missing something truly glaring.
I did a lot of testing between adding features, addressing bug fixes, and then random attention-getting marketing like blog posts that happen to mention cats or money or other things people care more about than software. There was no comparison to the amount of attention they got, the tangential posts got many, many more people in the door than the technical posts. The steady feature improvements are what will keep people there, while fluffy emotional blog posts are what will attract a lot of window shoppers. It’s better if the blog posts are relevant to your app and feature announcements, of course, but I’m saying you can get users faster without writing software. It’s just a hard problem and a delicate balance, and don’t get stuck thinking “if I build it they will come.” Some amount of marketing is needed. And don’t get stuck writing ads or blog posts either. Some amount of attention to the software is needed. Do as much of both as you can.
It’s very difficult to get users to talk, whether they like your app or not. Most of the time they don’t know enough to be able to articulate what they want or need, even though they can sense it. And the people that talk loudest aren’t often the most important to listen to, especially if they’re not paying for anything.
Good Luck!
I felt this one.
I need to hear this. Wow, really well thought out sentence. It makes so much sense.
Just fix the next step and start with the first step.
Repeat until IPO (Ha!!)
Great comment.
1. Build in public—I'm using twitter heavily to share the journey, progress, etc. I've optimised my twitter profile to make it super clear what I'm doing. https://twitter.com/Martin_Adams
2. YouTube. I'm creating deep, genuinely helpful videos aimed directly at users who have a need and are searching for problem in the direct space my product fit in. I'm creating videos teaching how to use competitor products with an opportunity to introduce what I'm building. I don't think there's any platform as accessible to tap into active search results. Here's an example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6qfrRVUOO8
3. Funnel people to join your mailing list. I'm using ConvertKit and now averaging about 5 people per day just from the above two actions. My record is two days with 19 people dropping their email in. I have 124 people on my email list who are now interested and relevant to my project due to the YouTube content. My landing page is here: https://join.flowtelic.com.
4. Reply to other people on HN, Reddit, etc and try to be genuinely helpful with an opportunity to introduce what you're doing. This reply is an example of that.
From there you can chat to people on Twitter and email your mailing list directly for feedback.
Especially like the simple pricing and no vendor lock in.
Well done, might take this for a spin sometime.
https://obsidian.md
I must admit I've also fallen in your trap many times myself. It's too fun to just go ahead and build something sometimes without considering the best way to find those early users first.
That said, the first step is finding your customers. If you can't find them to talk with them, how will you find them to sell to them?
I often skim the crib sheet on the last few pages to remind myself of the goodness within.
- Adding an update to an Indie Hacker product profile with a link to a blog post
- Adding a post to the "Share Your Startup" thread in r/startups, which has been a thread that is started on the first of each month [0]
But, in general, I have the same questions as you, so I don't imagine this will provide more than a small boost in feedback.
[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/startups/?f=flair_name%3A%22Share%2...
I would say FB groups, subreddits, meetups around your potential customers' industry are a much better start.